001100010010011110

@BerrySweetHigh, Let me try a hypothetical analogy and see how you think of it. "Is berrysweet going to cheat again with some new account? Are you going to scam another contest?" Now, please, don't reply or argue about these hypothetical comments, or you are the one starting the fight according to your impeccable logical reasoning. Let's try a few more just in case things don't sink in... "Berrysweet frequents his local gloryhole, because they like the feel of a stubly beard against their pollen sac." "I heard berrysweet records himself punching random senior citizens on the street for his instagram channel." "I heard berrysweet is such a michael jackson fanboy, that he installed a wine-for-kids bar in his bedroom." You see, if you reply to that sort of stuff, it's perfectly normal not to be nice. Now, this was all hypothetical, of course. I'm not actually asking absurd questions or accusing you of anything. To do so with no evidence and just a personal grudge is about as sophisticated as the salem witch trials. Also, you completely misrepresent reality with your reductive summation. Methinks thou doth protest too much. You are the account at of nowhere that clearly understood how the website works from day 1. You play childish games, because nobody can be that fucking retarded. Happy Growing, dood!

@m0use, https://youtu.be/NgpXxwJDa8E?t=440

Somebody's scamming the contests? I am shocked! https://youtu.be/hopB6NkYFgQ?t=18

@einamio, I did the math 91 images competing, 35 are theirs from the collective of accounts they are running 4 so fair that I identified. 1)ykscotttyk25 2)kathlane24 3)adrianwilskut 4)rensie, = 5/13ths of the images uploaded or 38% However some of the images uploaded are not memes, 8 in total. so it changes the numbers a bit. 83 memes competing 35 are "theirs" =35/83rds as it can't be reduced or 42% of the memes upload, just shy of half lol.

@m0use, So, this guy has long-term knowledge of going-ons at GD, yet it is a 5 day old account, and they are calling you fake? I'd be embarassed to write out something so overtly irrational and illogical. The sadder part might be the people fooled by such a superficial and lazy ploy. Bet it's another guru/grandmaster like-whore utilizing 1 of their 50 accounts. *not all grandmasters are like-whores, but the "like-whores" are all grandmasters and gurus. They'll talk up a mediocre product in exchange for 1 peanut. They'll "pat themselves on the back" with manufactured likes and comments from fake accounts and automated scripts. Just think of the person that engages in such insecure behaviour? What kind of foul, trashy, automaton-like individual does that sort of thing?

@gottagrowsometime, Sog/scrog was completely unrelated to my intiial reply. You just made shit up, again. I don't need AI, i have an excellent education and self-learning is easy for me. AI gives popular answers because of what it is learning from - primarily from the lower 2/3rds of ditribution curve for intelligence, lol. At some point it will be a useful tool, but not yet. it's just persistently difficult to understand what you type out because the semantics are so discombobulated and riddled with errors of all types. While you made a comment intiially congratulating or wishing others well, 90% of the message is just you self-fellating. Might as well remove a rib for easier access. You'll get fewer cramps. https://youtu.be/vYPgN-gtjGQ -- Just the first few seconds are necessary as I think it is an excellent analog to your first comment.

@m0use, Bruh.. bruh... bruh-science, bruh! Clearly it is made with love and that is all that matters. If it doesn't work well, just add more love. Its exact contents are not important. These are not the droids you are looking for. Move along.

@AsNoriu, That sort of motivation is foreign to me. I don't get the child-like antics of pretending to be something that you are not. I don't see the value in that. It's not my fault i get nuked for opinions that contradict revenue streams of GD, or some little snitch-user complaining after they instigate an argument and get their panties in a twist... probably needing surgery to remove the cotton from their flaps. They need a burner account because they shill like a 2-dollar prostitute on their primary account and don't want to ruin their free supply of overpriced products. This one seems to be attempting to impersonate a previous user, too.

@BudXXXs, "YourButtHurts" or, maybe that is a question. While there are endless scammers rotating through, think you are missing the target here. Not sure i'm allowed to share an opinion that goes against marketing on this site without being banned (not really a punishment, lol), but these products wreak of shamanism, so in at least 1 small way it'd be good for the cheats to win this month.

@gottagrowsometime, Thanks for the update dood. I was wondering if you had gotten all 5 new photoperiods or not. And, each strain will have 1/4 of a row each? Is that like john madden saying 90% of the game is 1/2 mental (referring to football)? The NFL is 45% mental, according to Jon. That's amazing. Super! Good Job!

Curing does not increase potency. From the moment you kill the plant, potency only goes one direction, down. You can slow it, but you never reverse it. Light is by far your biggest enemy. Replacing air with N2 is also excellent to avoid the degredatyion caused by O2. An anaerobic environment, if sealed for too long, will result in brown weed that tastes like shit... like old commercial shwag weed, which some do prefer. Once fully dry, vacuum sealing is a great way to go too. DIY is the only way to go. Not time-consuming at all. I made 4 in less than 5 minutes and that is no exaggeration. See video in diary week 1. I can only imagine what they'd charge for somethign you can diy in 5minute. The pump is your only major cost and if only 1 bucket or a few jars, you don't need much. A bunch will require a commercial pump and a 1/2 lead line to a manifold that pipes down to 1/4" The check valves require a good amount of pressure to open up. Definitely get the thicker buckets or they balloon out and probably crack within a couple years. Black and opaque preferred but can always cover it in aluminum foil

@SkunkleDamo, so someone with your screen name didn't come here and shit the bed? talking about "this person's only been here 12 days, therefore any retarfd would conclude they are a troll!" i may be paraphrasing a bit. If you are smart, you don't make use of it. The only sad thing here is that this entire thread is not visible except in activity log / notifications. You are still a pud. And stay at home moms/dads are lazy daytime drinkers. bwahah so an associates degree? that's like 1 or 2 psychology classes. I took that many, lol. Associates degrees.. BWAHAHAHAH.

@SkunkleDamo, lol psychology major.. Surprised you aren't a stay at home mom. Did you also dabble in photography?

@SkunkleDamo, Low-hanging fruit of a typographical error is right in your wheelhouse, eh? Might be why you keep growing seedy weed, lol.

@SkunkleDamo, We'ere not freinds and this isn't a conversation. I'm talking at you. You are a trash-dick monkey that shits the bed on other people's diaries due to made up nonsense in your head.

@AsNoriu, only growing my own weed now.. infuse something new into the genetics pool each year, but mostly avoiding buying shit, especially bulk seed. At this point i believe the names given to weed strains reflects the averages sophistication of a pot grower. not really a parallel they way you are using it. I mostly get attacked for using deductive reasoning and not blindly following anecdotal nonsense that was never proven. Same type of people prone to falling for religions, chriopractors, purveyors of holistic health and other magic. A karen, on their own, reacts in some entitled way.. There is no logic or reason behind it. I only react back to people that attack me. I rarely initiate/instigate anything. Like the guy who wrote foul shit on my diary. He then calls me a 'troll' for responding to him. Then, he gets upset that i am responding to him. It's as if iwthin 1 day their short attention-span can't recall they initiated the entire interaction. I would argue, they are the karen. Hey you know.. if peopel want to beleive flushing at end of harvest reduces minerals in the plant, despite the fact there is no biological system in the plant that can do that, is measurably and consistently untrue, and absurd to think transpiration carries it off in the first place, that's great for them. It's not mean to say that isn't smart.. it just isn't smart for overt reasons. The disputes usually arise from someone being insecure, write something rude, then get upset they get a rude reply. Well, fuck'em. 2 wrongs don't make a right, but there's no cure for a dumpster fire of nonsense, either.

@SkunkleDamo, Bwahah you are a so-called educated professional that goes around writing nasty comments with no proof and act the victim. You came here. I didn't seek you out. Makes sense you are in psychology. I bet it is the cognitive branch of psychology? That's the branch for blowhards. Not that the behavioural branch is much better. That whole science is equivalent to 1800s medical experts tossing leaches on people to suck the evil out. You say degree so it's safe to assume it's just an undergrad degree at that - basically a high school guidance counselor. your baseless conclusions have no credibility now, nor your initial insulting comment on my grow diary. "I insult people. Then call them trolls as they reply to me. Woe is me. Why does this happen to me, god!" - Skunkledamo the sanctimonious victim. I only use it in a negative way toward assholes like yourself that present themselves on a platter. You sure do make an ass out of yourself assuming things.

@SkunkleDamo, better than posessing 3 #21 chromosomes, corky.

@SkunkleDamo, skunkledamo is a polyploid.

@SkunkleDamo, This guy is the poster child for peyronie's disease. remove your nonsense from my diaries and i'll stop replying daily. you half-wit shaved monkey