Chat
RecommendedRecommended

"Ōdinus" C#5

3
55
18
2100
a year ago
Follow
3
Main-Lining
weeks 18
Defoliation
weeks 18, 25
Topping
weeks 3, 16
LST
weeks 3-8
Bone Meal
Grow medium
Blood Meal
Grow medium
Fish Bone Meal
Grow medium
Kelp Meal
Grow medium
Gypsum
Grow medium
Wollastonite
Grow medium
Dolomitic Lime
Grow medium
Basalt Rock Dust
Grow medium
Humic Acid
Grow medium
Mycorrhizae Innoculant
Grow medium
Worm Castings
Grow medium
Azomite
Grow medium
Greensand
Grow medium
Shrimp Chitin
Grow medium
Crab Chitin
Grow medium
Perlite
Grow medium
Vermiculite
Grow medium
Coco Coir
Grow medium
Pumice
Grow medium
Seashells
Grow medium
Hydroton Pebbles
Grow medium
Charcoal
Grow medium
Peat Moss
Grow medium
Grow Conditions
Week 16
Vegetation
18 hrs
Light Schedule
28
Β°C
Β°F
Day Air Temperature
6+ conditions after
Login
Grow Technique Usage
Topping
Technique
Commented by
Ultraviolet Ultraviolet
a year ago
Understanding The Numbers: If you have been researching LED horticulture lighting systems for your grow space, you have likely been bombarded with a variety of metrics that lighting manufacturers use to market their products. Some terms and acronyms you are likely to see include watts, lumens, LUX, foot candles, PAR, PPF, PPFD, and photon efficiency. While all of these terms do relate to lighting, only a select few really tell you the important metrics of a horticulture lighting system. The purpose of this is to define these terms and acronyms, correct some common misunderstandings, and help growers understand which metrics are applicable to horticulture lighting systems, and which ones are not. Humans Use Lumens Plants and people perceive light very differently from one another. Humans and many other animals use something called photopic vision in well-lit conditions to perceive color and light. Lumens are a unit of measurement based on a model of human eye sensitivity in well-lit conditions, which is why the model is called the photopic response curve (Figure 1). As you can see, the photopic response curve is bell-shaped and shows how humans are much more sensitive to green light than blue or red light. LUX and foot candle meters measure the intensity of light (using lumens) for commercial and residential lighting applications, with the only difference between the two being the unit of the area they are measured over (LUX uses lumen/m2 and foot candle uses lumen/ft2). Figure 1 Using LUX or foot candle meters to measure the light intensity of horticulture lighting systems will give you varying measurements depending on the spectrum of the light source, even if you are measuring the same intensity of PAR. The fundamental problem with using LUX or foot candle meters when measuring the light intensity of horticulture lighting systems is the underrepresentation of blue (400 – 500 nm) and red (600 – 700 nm) light in the visible spectrum. Humans may not be efficient at perceiving light in these regions, but plants are highly efficient at using red and blue light to drive photosynthesis. This is why lumens, LUX, and foot candles should never be used as metrics for horticulture lighting. What is PAR PAR is photosynthetic active radiation. PAR light is the wavelengths of light within the visible range of 400 to 700 nanometers (nm) that drive photosynthesis (Figure 1). PAR is a much-used (and often misused) term related to horticulture lighting. PAR is NOT a measurement or β€œmetric” like feet, inches or kilos. Rather, it defines the type of light needed to support photosynthesis. The amount and spectral light quality of PAR light are important metrics to focus on. (To find out more about spectral light quality click here). Quantum sensors are the primary instrument used to quantify the light intensity of horticulture lighting systems. These sensors work by using an optical filter to create a uniform sensitivity to PAR light (Figure 1) and can be used in combination with a light meter to measure the instantaneous light intensity or a data logger to measure cumulative light intensity. Three important questions you should look to be answered when researching horticulture lighting systems are: How much PAR does the fixture produce (measured as Photosynthetic Photon Flux)? How much instantaneous PAR from the fixture is available to plants (measured as Photosynthetic Photon Flux Density)? How much energy is used by the fixture to make PAR available to your plants (measured as Photon Efficiency)? The three key metrics used to answer these questions are: PPF is photosynthetic photon flux. PPF measures the total amount of PAR that is produced by a lighting system each second. This measurement is taken using a specialized instrument called an integrating sphere that captures and measures essentially all photons emitted by a lighting system. The unit used to express PPF is micromoles per second (ΞΌmol/s). This is probably the second most important way of measuring a horticulture lighting system, but, for whatever reason, most lighting companies don’t list this metric. It is important to note that PPF does not tell you how much of the measured light actually lands on the plants, but is an important metric if you want to calculate how efficient a lighting system is at creating PAR. PPFD is photosynthetic photon flux density. PPFD measures the amount of PAR that actually arrives at the plant, or as a scientist might say: β€œthe number of photosynthetically active photons that fall on a given surface each second”. PPFD is a β€˜spot’ measurement of a specific location on your plant canopy, and it is measured in micromoles per square meter per second (ΞΌmol/m2/s). If you want to find out the true light intensity of a lamp over a designated growing area (e.g. 4’ x 4’), it is important that the average of several PPFD measurements at a defined height are taken. Lighting companies that only publish the PPFD at the center point of a coverage area grossly overestimate the true light intensity of a fixture. A single measurement does not tell you much, since horticulture lights are generally brightest in the center, with light levels decreasing as measurements are taken towards the edges of the coverage area. (Caveat Emptor: Lighting manufacturers can easily manipulate PPFD data. To ensure you are getting actual PPFD values over a defined growing area, the following needs to be published by the manufacturer: measurement distance from the light source (vertical and horizontal), number of measurements included in the average, and the min/max ratio). Fluence always publishes the average PPFD over a defined growing area at a recommended mounting height for all of our lighting systems. Photon Efficacy refers to how efficient a horticulture lighting system is at converting electrical energy into photons of PAR. Many horticulture lighting manufacturers use total electrical watts or watts per square foot as a metric to describe the light intensity. However, these metrics really don’t tell you anything since watts are a measurement describing electrical input, not light output. If the PPF of the light is known along with the input wattage, you can calculate how efficient a horticulture lighting system is at converting electrical energy into PAR. As a reminder, the unit for PPF is ΞΌmol/s, and the unit to measure watts is Joule per second (J/s), therefore, the seconds in the numerator and denominator cancel out, and the unit becomes Β΅mol/J. The higher this number is, the more efficient a lighting system is at converting electrical energy into photons of PAR. Conclusion In order to invest in the proper horticulture lighting system to meet your cultivation and business goals, you need to know the PPF, PPFD, and photon efficiency to make informed purchasing decisions. However, these three metrics should not be used as sole variables to base purchasing decisions. There are several other variables such as form factor and coefficient of utilization (CU) that need to be considered as well. All factors need to be used in combination to select the most appropriate systems based on your cultivation and business goals, and the take-home message is that PPF, PPFD, and photon efficiency are the proper metrics used by scientists and industry-leading horticulture lighting companies. If a company does not provide you with the correct metrics used for horticulture lighting, they should not be selling horticulture lighting systems, and you will not be able to verify the true efficacy of their system. Fluence Bioengineering always publishes these metrics in product literature and is one of the leaders in photosynthetic photon efficiency as verified by Rutgers and Utah State University.
Similar Diaries
Fast Buds Seeds
1 weeks
Fast Buds Seedsjamilahsalum
Fast Buds - Cheese Auto
4 days ago
"Ultra Vires" C#4
19 weeks
"Ultra Vires" C#4Ultraviolet
+2 strains
2 years ago Β· 16 comments
Godfather OG
14 weeks
Godfather OGTheNorthernCultivator
Dr. Seeds - Godfather
2 years ago Β· 2 comments
STRAWBERRY GORILLA AUTO
6 weeks
STRAWBERRY GORILLA AUTOmike97
Fast Buds - Strawberry Gorilla Auto
9 days ago
First Freiluft-Grow
4 weeks
First Freiluft-GrowBluetenVomBodensee
Royal Queen Seeds - Wedding Cake Automatic
4 days ago Β· 1 comment
NordicGrow
2 weeks
NordicGrow Blazingmonkie
Fast Buds - Skunk Auto
5 days ago
Comments
Login

Show by Week
Sort by
popularity
popularity
newest
oldest
love_2_grow
love_2_growweek 0
Happy Growing, Buddy! 🌱🌱🌱
Ultraviolet
Ultraviolet
@love_2_grow, Always brother!
NegotiatedBubble
NegotiatedBubbleweek 25
In which wavelength were those bottom photos taken?
NegotiatedBubble
NegotiatedBubble
@Ultraviolet, it looked a bit pink-ish to me. Some photographers use wavelengths during the shot that bring out certain features. The composite photos made out of different wavelengths are quite pretty.
Ultraviolet
Ultraviolet
@NegotiatedBubble, Urm I harvested the main flowers and left a few popcorn nugs at the bottom of the plant then put it back to veg, the bottom pictures are taken under a full spectrum lighting 400-700nm, heavily damaged from UV exposure PH tomfoolery.
HAPPYWEEDS
HAPPYWEEDSweek 20
Very interesting diary. I follow it so I don't miss anything. Good job mate and I wish you all the best on your garden πŸ’šπŸš€πŸ––πŸ‘½πŸ€œπŸ€›
HAPPYWEEDS
HAPPYWEEDS
@Ultraviolet, you will do a nice job as before πŸ’ͺ
Ultraviolet
Ultraviolet
@HappyWeeds, Well if it makes one person happy if even for a moment, thank you for your kind words I shall try not to mess it up! Toke on!
Zappdoggy
Zappdoggyweek 20
An excellent article on Blue. Many Thanks. Since I started playing with the other colours its nice to see the info getting out there. I'm completely convinced with adding more of the spectrum. I would love to see a well controlled comparative grow between with and without adding the blue or extra colours using a typical grow light like from Spider Farm or similar as a base. And thanks for all the links to those papers.
Zappdoggy
Zappdoggy
@Ultraviolet, I think I like your thinking. πŸ˜€
Ultraviolet
Ultraviolet
@Zappdoggy, You just gave me the best Idea ! Thank you zappy
TheFattyMcCoy
TheFattyMcCoyweek 18
Loving all the knowledge you have on here! Excellent info. Is that girl your mother? ❀️ The Fatty McCoy
Ultraviolet
Ultraviolet
@TheFattyMcCoy, These are some clones from a previous grow, was meant to be a comparison between monster-cropped clones at varying stages of flower but they at this stage are growing equally well I can't tell the difference tbh.
Zappdoggy
Zappdoggyweek 25
MMMMM!. I have had some Godfather and found it to be very good for pain. Pretty heavy handed buzz too.
Ultraviolet
Ultraviolet
@Zappdoggy, agreed Surprised me that's for sure.
Dabking
Dabkingweek 25
Nice harvest. Also, you refer to the calyx, however I believe you are talking about the pistils.
Ultraviolet
Ultraviolet
@Dabking, Thank you for pointing that out, I edited it to correct it.