in soilless context, should jsut be giving ~60 ppm P and 180-200 ppm K the whole time.
the plants needs all of these molecules at all times in a particular ratio. That ratio may change at times but not as much as most believe. withholding p/k then overdosing it at soem point in flower isn't going to have the effect that people perpetuate.
if you looked up what atoms constitute the cells and what produces these pretty complex molecules we care about (cannibanoids et al), you'll see it isn't pur K or P. The plant needs a well-balanced diet at all times even if less N is needed after leaf growth and stem elongation ceases, because planty of bits still need N or molecules with N in it as a building block. Nucleic acids in DNA is one example.
i feed 120-130 ppm N in vege and slowly drop closer to 100-110 over 3-4 weeks of flower. Very little else needs to change. The plant dictates and plants act in similar ways most of the time. if your mileage varies in that way, it is a sign of an esoteric nutrient formula that isn't as good as advertised.
A lot of these fertilizer manufacturers catering to marijuana growers ignored existing knowledge and did their own thing, and it shows. There's a reason why the nutes that follow the science are all very similar (soilless/hydro context). master blend, jacks nutrients, pro line of athena (3x expensive for no reason), southern ag and others all have a product this is virtually identical becaue it's based off the same research and knowledge that undoubtedly is better than any extrapolation someone cna make just growing some plants and not systematically observing and measuring outcomes while comparing to a baseline to guage effect of whatever it hypothesis is being tested. ... not .. "i added this p k and things turned out awesome, buddy.. for sure.. i have nothing to compare it to but if i did something that hand no effect my ego couldn't handle it" lol.
there are so many unsubstantiated myths in this "culture" it is downright hilarious.