<span class="link_user">@Ivy_Vivosun</span>, I must say this is much more information than I expected, and I genuinely appreciate it. My first reaction to this is curiosity. Managing condensation is managing dew point, so the same as logic as the Cannatrol. This is expected as this is the same logic for antiques/books/meats/cheeses/and more. I can see how from an engineering standpoint a first pass would be where the raw power is (compressors). Does this not have some impact on the local environment? From my understanding, and this is my words of whitepapers that have been reproduced, is that trichome cuticles measure a couple molecules thick and that things on the order of vapor pressure gradients (essentially invisible waves caused by things like compressors) were enough to rupture heads...especially in dry/cure. Ruptured heads leak, and by that mechanism you lose secondary metabolite mass.
The Cannatrol team has had this finding of increased trichome integrity both by reproduced manual gridding/counting of heads and a (novel?) chromatography method. Have yall confirmed that you are on the same order increase as Cannatrol? Granted, a TEC will never last as long as a compressor device...a TEC doesn't mechanically change the environment of the flower when I think about how the device functions. I guess that is my original concern with the design and something folks like myself have questioned since the announcement until now.