By continuing to use the website or clicking Accept you consent to our cookies and personal data policy and confirm that you are at least 18 year old. For details please see Privacy Policy and Terms
@growdiaries@fast_buds
The 3rd place winner is a SCAM and useing images souced from the web that are not of their own. Their entire profile is a JOKE and created to scam GOTM contest and Other Contests.
The source links to the image they posted as their own are linked below.
https://www.rxgreentechnologies.com/blog/care-of-seedlings/
https://dailyhive.com/grow/plant-to-bowl-growing-cannabis-at-home-crop-king-seeds
https://hightimes.com/grow/high-times-interview-cannarado-genetics/
you really need to do better when finazlieing these contests. its not the first time you pick trolls in the top 3.
@Patricia_Zamnesia, Hey,
Thanks for your message. I hear what you’re saying, and I get that my reaction came off harsh. But I hope you can also understand why it came out that way.
You personally hyped me up for this contest. That built real excitement and trust. So when the judging process felt rushed, unclear, and even disrespectful at times, it hit hard. It wasn’t just about losing. It was about feeling misled and unappreciated after putting in serious time and effort.
Judging based on wet trim? That’s like reviewing a haircut before it’s dry. Totally incomplete and unfair. And when Bread & Buds, a judge publicly tied to your brand, called people’s plants “ugly,” that wasn’t just unprofessional. It was insulting. Especially when some of us were just sharing honest feedback. Feedback that clearly wasn’t just mine alone. A lot of others in the community felt similarly but didn’t speak up.
What’s worse is the speed of the decisions. With 180 participants and the deadline not even fully used, it gives the impression that winners were already chosen or the process wasn’t as thorough as it should have been. That’s a tough pill to swallow after putting heart, soul, and months of work into this.
To me, it started to feel less like a celebration of growers and more like a rushed marketing push. And frankly, that’s disappointing because I expected more from Zamnesia.
I hope you take this as constructive, not just criticism. I genuinely cared about this contest and believed in it. That’s why I reacted the way I did. If you want to rebuild trust with the community, it’s going to take transparency, fair judging, and reps who lift people up, not tear them down.
@m0use, yo mouse I get you, this case was different.
Bread andbuds was the judge here acting like the president, he told me last year he would never let dog doctor be in the top 10.. and we all know how nice dogdoctor can be to you in this situations.
He is crooked af just cherry picked people who kissing his ass.
He even promised me I would win until his ego grow so big and I stopped being nice to him.
So I know for fact how he did this..
@D33jW, We all got cat fished, lesson learnt i wont ever be competiting again ill put my time and efforts into something else, mr suitcaise with upscaled picture won based on wet trim??? really? if wondering why the judging was so poor i mean look at bread and buds grows he was of the judges so you can see where the vote orginated from :joy:
@Patricia_Zamnesia, This contest can not be taken serious Patricia, I'm really disappointed in y'all. I think even a blind man can see the top 10 isn't right
@Cauli, where you getting always from? Just cause you win with those small bud sizes doesn’t mean the judging wasn’t fair there plenty other people should have won and didn’t win, read the rest of the comment even some of the people that have won don’t agree with the voting it’s clear to say the judges aren’t growers neither is bread and bunds with his small Larry autos the contest should have been called cannabis photoshop photography Yall know more how to edit an image then grow a hefty big cola
@Bread_n_Buds,
I'm honestly offended that you’re even trying to compare yourself to me.
You grow autos those tiny dwarf plants and you really think that puts you on the same level?
Come on those autos got you smoked :joy::joy::joy:
You're defending aesthetics over actual grow performance in a grow competition, and that alone says a lot especially coming from someone who was on the judging panel. If visuals are all that matter, then let’s call it a photo contest, not a grow off.|
This contest should have been called Cannabis Photographgy
You’re out here acting like a judge, throwing shade and calling my plants “ugly” like that’s some kind of professional critique. If you were actually involved in the judging process, then it makes perfect sense why so many people feel this contest was a joke. And to be honest, your behavior just reinforces that. I’m seriously reconsidering being associated with this brand or any future contests if this is the level of "professionalism" behind the scenes.
Also, it’s ironic to hear all this from someone whose own grows are far from impressive. You talk about commitment, but maybe start by applying that standard to your own work before commenting on others.
The whole idea that grow scores are “falsified” and only images matter completely discredits the time, effort, and transparency serious growers put into their diaries bud size, weight, development stages, interactions, and full documentation.
This kind of logic is exactly why so many legit growers are walking away from these contests.
This conversation’s going nowhere.
I’ll be the bigger person take care