By continuing to use the website or clicking Accept you consent to our cookies and personal data policy and confirm that you are at least 18 year old. For details please see Privacy Policy and Terms
I fucked up putting too much plants in my grow tent with shitty lights, but lesson learned: less is more. I don't think i would grow again that strain because from 4 seeds i've harvested 2 different phenos. The smoke is great, ideal for chill before sleep, the buds are really dense and the smell is delicious
Thank you very much for trusting our strains, and sharing your experience.
I see that you have rated our strain with a 4/10. Any notes to tell us?
Sweet smokes!
-Apolo
@Cheapgrowing,
I do understand that about the "consistency" and I understand why you'd tell them about that, too. People tend to want like "cloned" things.
"Also the fact that my nickname is this is a thing of pure fantasy, because many times on Growdiaries you see people with really expensive setups, on the other hand, having a limited budget i try to get the best out by spending very little"
Yeah, I understand that too, since I use almost nothing commercial (seeds, setup, nutrients, etc) since I don't "sell product" and I got no money, so just trying to tell you that, depending on perspective or use (and I wouldn't know what your intentions are) you can often leverage that sort of situation.
My nickname isn't much more than fantasy either...
@sir_isO, what i meant is that if i buy a strain in which the seed bank claims to have about 80% chance of showing the purple phenotype, it means that i, for example, out of 4 plants should have at least 3 plants capable of showing those features. The fact that i only had one purple causes genetic instability due to the work done by the seed bank. In commercial terms, a consumer could feel cheated in some way, if we want to put it that way. Also the fact that my nickname is this is a thing of pure fantasy, because many times on Growdiaries you see people with really expensive setups, on the other hand, having a limited budget i try to get the best out by spending very little. Nonetheless, i appreciate that you wanted to share your experience and opinion with me!
@Cheapgrowing,
Your name is cheapgrowing?
Lemme tell you about cheap growing...just an alternative perspective.
"There is also diversity at the level of terpenes and plant morphology, this determines a high instability of the strain. This is a huge disadvantage of this genetics, it also goes to the detriment of the fact that, although they seem different strains, the taste is really great. "
Those, to ME, are often GOOD properties, because if you grow your own stuff, pollinate them manually, that sort of thing... it means the genetics are more amenable for adaptation, naturalization, hybridization, less recession. But then, I've never bought a seed and the only commercial seeds I've grown were freebies sent to me by Humboldt (TBK and Black Dog, both excellent, but Black Dog is a very mild strain, TBK is really nice though, pretty much overwhelming sort of fruity smell...not that I'm trying to offend Sweet Seeds, I simply haven't tried any of their stuff...that I know of).
I have personally grown a bit more than a thousand of these things though (always in soil outdoor, no matter what time of year coz it's Africa), so I've seen an enormous amount of effects, conditions, genetic variations.
Recently chopped some 4 meter 10 month old sativa dominant hybrids...that started growing in about mid-winter....
But hey, I'm a bit weird like that. Like I don't appreciate autoflowers (stressed genetics, I mean, they flower quickly because of their natural environmental pressures, very short growing season so they're, imo usually a fair bit less complex than slower growers...though the slower growers are obviously also the hardest plants to grow) and inbred things (stagnant genetics with high probability of "chromosomal fuckups") that much.
Cheapgrowing
