You'll probably have more maintenance as far as checking pH, sanitation and other stuff to ensure the water remains healthy for the plants.
I have a pretty simple soilless setup. 55-gal barrel, a pump and a drain pump with float switch. I turn it on. Wait for runoff. I turn it off. I walk away. Except when i have to do maintenance on the plants, i spend 2minutes a day in my tent. While it runs i look over plants and make sure everything is growing smoothly. I have to clean it every 30-40 days because I keep it dark, cool along with my refill routing. Surface to volume ratio impacts the rate of water fouling. If it smells or turbidty is less than clear, i'll clean sooner but at 30-day intervals that does not happen. It can probably go 50-60 days if not being overly safe about it.
I have solenoid valves and a web-enabled orbit app that could do irrigations remotely, if needed. I prefer to supervise because this shit will fail at some point. The float switch will fail or a drip emitter will be slightly clogged etc. If i ever go away for an extended period of time i can always hook up the solenoid valves and use the remote app. These sorts of worries are the same for each even if in slightly different ways.
Good nutes can avoid pH drift - important for both, but 2x so for DWC. Shitty hydro nutes are poorly buffered if they drift constantly. This is important for both contexts.
In the end it really doesn't matter. What you save in substrate costs you'll spend on something else keeping the water 'clean' in a dwc or testing/maintenance etc. Maybe you spend a few more minutes per week monitoring the water quality in a DWC. Any difference that small can be ignored.
You'd have to figure out what you want to do.. write down all the parts and recurring costs of each and compare, because it depends a lot on how you implement each method. they can both be "push a button and walk away" simplicity.
both can be an absurd amount of work if done poorly.