Nice review video, gave it a view. They look just like the ACI sidebar lighting. Almost assuredly using the exact same chips, diodes, power modules, and so on as ACI considering there are only so many manufacturers and they're all in China.
I would think I prefer the ACI kit, as I would rather have a stand-alone controller (those little in-line ones or a hard-wired one rather than wi-fi or bluetooth connected for settings, way too many devices already online in my tents to add an unneeded one. You can even rip it apart and use it as a smart controllor for other stuff, can't do that with the USB stick. The magnetic placement for both brands suck it appears. Neither brand gives enough cords it appears.
IDK. I did the full bar lights, 100 true Watt draw on canopy lighting...does absolutely nothing but incentivizes you to make bad canopy decisions. My white bar lights run a 4x4 VEG now and my UV bars get used for many purposess, but never as under canopy lighting.
I am also not a fan of vivosun. Have had critical failures on their controller before (their PCB burning out on some circuits which is as bad as terrible can get besides it burning your entire house down).
Here is Vivosun in a single sentence: "We are one of the most well-known budget brands in the global cannabis cultivation industry, yet we are going to release a fake cannatrol which does not do what the cannatrol does but we will imply that it does and we will also crowdfund all research and manufacturing money because we are too stingy to do any real development ourselves, it will be released once you pay us to design it." That REALLY sat with me wrong. and I don't think I'll ever look at them the same. It reeked of Tesla taking cybertruck preorders years before they even had a truck frame design... At least ACI develops new gear without taking interest-free loans from growers. They have their own problems though, not shilling for them, just pointing out how these companies behave completely opposite of one another