Chat
Recommended

Lampenabstand falsch oder normal

Lupi85
Lupi85started grow question 4d ago
Auf dem Aktuellen Bild sieht man das die Pflanze sich doch ziemlich gestreckt hat und ich habe sie eingentlich nur oben ein wenig entlaubt, ist das normal oder hab ich beim Abstand der Lampe was falsch gemacht. Danke für die Hilfe danke.
Solved
Week 6
likes
00110001001001111O
00110001001001111Oanswered grow question 4d ago
Stop defoliating so much. that can cause excess stretch, too. competition for light can cause excess stretch. insufficient light can cause excess stretch. As far as hanging distance -- is node spacing proper? if too lanky, you have some evidence to blame the light. Looks like it could have used a bit more light, but, when each branch has significant competition for light, they also stretch out even if the light is not the problem. Is there a lot of overlapping leaves between the branches? easier to see in real life rather than a picture from the side. Removing leaves at the top can cause the plant to try to reach for more light... Stop removing leaves for 'bro-science' reasons. Read 'to defoliate or not...' on cocoforcannabis.com for a more eloquent explanation as to why you should not defoliate for the bro-science reasons often given. It's hard to say exactly why somethign happened when there are so many moving/changing variables. Assess your situations and apply the known concepts for a best guess. Stick to ~3 colas per sq ft. Based on size of area that plant is filling, you can probably shorten your vege... a ton of wasted vertical growth you don't use. you want to minimize how much you have to lollipop, not maximize it. that may help too... longer vege = bigger stretch potential. Not much you do now will change the outcome, but maybe splay the plant out slightly -- without snapping a branch. Try to spread it out along the length of the light as best you can... some graden wire pulling the outer branches further away from center etc etc... if you have to defoliate due to congestions, don't grow that congestion next time. For most phenos, you only need ~3 colas per sq ft to maximize yield. (in ambient co2, figure 50-70g per sq ft is your ceiling for average to above average yielding phenos.) Phenos known for tiny buds may want more branches per sq ft, but again, you don't want a congested canopy, either. i find 3 colas per sq ft gives me good-sized nugs that aren't too large i have to worry about bud rot and disease. It allows great light penetration but still captures all the light (no gaps). I have to do very little pruning or extra maintenance in regard to axial growth or leaves. Everything you cut off the plant is wasted time and resources growing it. Some of it is inevitable to avoid larf, but we can minimize it greatly by improving our methods systematically from grow to grow. If you regularly approach or exceed 50g/sq ft using seeds, you are doing fine in regard to training and any pruning employed. If you use clones of known heavy yielders, you'll blast by that figure by 40% or more. CO2 might add another 25-30% on top of that? conflicting info on the exact amount it adds. As you try new things, this helps you set reasonable goals to strive for. Qulaity is just genetics... no magic product to put lipstick on a pig in that regard.
2 likes
Complain
Selected By The Grower
yan402
yan402answered grow question 4d ago
@RasendeRollo92 Lmfao alter, ich habe dich lieb Bro ✌️♥️
3 likes
Complain
m0use
m0useanswered grow question 4d ago
look extra stretched. prob needed stronger light when it was younger.
2 likes
Complain
Core_T_Son
Core_T_Sonanswered grow question 4d ago
Es sieht merkwürdig aus. Aber wenn du kontrollieren möchtest, ob deine Pflanze genug Licht erhält, dann nutze doch so eine App wie Photone oder so. Da kannst du den täglichen Lichtintegral bestimmen (also, wieviel Licht an einem Tag auf die gemessene Stelle trifft) und daran sehr gut erkennen, ob da noch wesentlich mehr Licht geht, oder besser nicht. Für‘s bloße Auge ist das schwer zu erkennen, für mich sieht das aber schon nach „gib mehr Stoff“ aus.
2 likes
Complain
Green_claws
Green_clawsanswered grow question 4d ago
Haha 01011010101 the full manuscript.. . To me it looks like your light was to far away or not strong so your node spacing is massive but could just be genetics.. Those leaves at the bottom are pointless.. up to you to remove or not.. Apart from the node spacing she look really good.. Good luck..
2 likes
Complain
RasendeRollo92
RasendeRollo92answered grow question 4d ago
Pick 0100010001… . Did not read complete text, but has to be correct as he wrote the 8th part of Harry Potter in behalf of Joanne K Rowlin 😂😂😂
4 likes
Complain
John_Kramer
John_Krameranswered grow question 4d ago
Actually this more likely due to K problem uptake U,re using too much Mg that leads to K lock, also Ca,P soon
1 like
Complain
AsNoriu
AsNoriuanswered grow question 4d ago
Think it was RQS pot and FB seeds ... ;))) Jokes aside, inner nod spacing is big, distance to light could be smaller during veg time.
3 likes
Complain
RasendeRollo92
RasendeRollo92answered grow question 4d ago
Hey 👋 Für gewöhnlich geht man nach PPM / Lux zum einstellen der Stärke und der Intensität der Lampe… Nichts desto trotz gibt es die Faustregel so ca. 35-40 cm Abstand zwischen der Pflanzenspitze und der Lampe zu haben… Manche machen sich auch 35 cm Bindfaden an die Lampe, mit einer Schraube / Mutter am Ende, um den Abstand gut anpassen zu können, ohne jedes Mal zu messen. Rein optisch würde ich sagen, dass die rechte Lampe (bei der kleinen Lady) ein wenig zu nah ist. Kann aber auch täuschen. Würde die also ein wenig anheben, wenn’s geht. Allgemein sehen deine Ladys allerdings gut aus, scheint also okay zu sein wie du es machst. Hoffe das hilft ein wenig ! Viel Erfolg im weiteren Verlauf 👊🍀🖖
3 likes
Complain