It is all just marketing. This means that they have observed those terps across runs, and that under infinite time in the hands of the breeder they were able to clock that THC and CBD %.
Now replicate their cut, their lights, their medium, their feeding, their available microbiome, and then you'll come out near those numbers.
The same exact plant grown run over run in the exact same manner will have nominal differences in microbiomes, leading to distinct secondary metabolite test results. Watch products in your area to visualize this.
Since you are a dynamic biological system with an incredulous amount of initial and boundary values that diverge from others, and given that the plant will not be consistent without the above notes applied run over run, do you think the "helps with" section is even needed, or just complete horseshit? I firmly stand on the latter.
Terpene wheel is old news, the other secondary metabolites of non-cannabinoid nature are where almost all taste and effect is modulated from, terpenes are kind of the last itty bitty little filter which hits the medicine. Unless you're a DoTerra sales rep, you know this already.
We still have people throwing terpenes into edibles with research pointing to no impact.