The problem is the bottom side of the leaf is not the same as the top. Light has to traverse more layers and is attenuated from underneath... So any light hittin gthere is significantly less impactful than light hitting the top of a leaf.
The intensity (umol/s) would have to be very low, because in some cases you will have contact with the leaves or be within inches etc.
With the heavy shielding, it's not going to penetrate far, so a high umol/s isn't needed anyway.
Using a klux or photone type app would help you pick where to hang it mid-canopy on perimeter - maybe slight angle downward. Depending on setup, the perimeter lights could be a bit stronger but still safe from 6-8". Any intra canopy stuff would fit the description above of very close placement to leaves, so very low intensity as to not burn shit. low wattage but could put at various depths based on shielding? May not need this without many plants or a very large plant. either light is shielded or it isn't ... if it is it would benefit to add light 'there'.
wouldn't want more than 35-40 dli on leaf surface.... knowing how much you can push relative to typical temps, rh, co2 levels would set the bar more precisely. even if oyu just know by klux that X is maximum... you'd know if you apply too much light in any particular area.
imho, too much hassle, lots of extra electricity that may or may not be justified by additional yield... if it sounds fun, sure, but good chance it's a boondoggle or flip a coin on cost effectiveness. Seems like a lot of wasted light not hitting the plant in an optimal way. The mid level perimeter lighting is probably more effective than intra canopy.. but just a guess.