they list a 2.5umol/j effiacy, which i don't entirely beleive, but probably not more than 10-20% off, either.
500 umol/s PAR total production rate for 2 of those lights. For 12 hour operation you need roughly 80umol/s per sq ft... 4sq ft x 80 = 320umol/s
for 18h operation (autoflowers) - only 214 umol/s -- again, a ballpark value that requires minimal fine-tuning.
So, you could very likely benefit from using both for photoperiods (Run at ~65% to start), but probably won't notice a huge difference in "Autoflower" plants -- what you saw was likely more about genetic diversity than the power of your light.
What you would benefit from is more uniform spread of light using 2 SF1000D. So, it's still and option and won't really cost too much more in watts, either. A good starting point would be ~44% power -- 2/3rds of what is required for 12 hour operation - the 65% value above for each light.
These suggestions won't be far off, but every garden has slightly different variables - primarily temp, rh% and co2 - that will impact how much you can give per day. Use new growth to fine-tune power of lights. Not too tight; not too stretchy... and you'll find that happy zone quickly.
If i was right about SF over-calculating efficacy, may need 10-20% more power... not +10% but 45% * 110% = about 50% for both lights. Regardless, you are using the plant growth to dictate the exact power you want, so you'll find the 'right' spot through some trial and error.