i did good ? xD grow box 0.14 square meters, 100w board on 75%, cheapest salts, White widow fem, homemade soil

Rare agree with 001. Like if you check my diaries, when I do photoperiod manipulation (and math it correctly on the DLI side) the hormonal impact, depending on the girl, is often more pronounced calyxes and depending on other factors can tend to foxtail. Which is exactly what I'm pushing for (shortened timelines and making washers out of non-washers). Anecdote but the only other time I can environmentally force such a pronounced response is by disrupting hormones the first few weeks of flower, which is generally a mega no-no.

Stem elongation, foxtials all over, loose, larfy buds... plus you tried to give 65+ DLI? So, a bunch of photo inhibition that likely correlates to the foxtailing and 2x electricty expense. The oddball 24/0 lighting in flower clearly caused stem elongation when you zoom in. Can see it all over the top colas, so it is safe to assume it happened below, too. Those aren't donkey dicks. They are a conglomerate of twigs. Try assessing the results honestly instead of trying so hard to prove yourself right. The larfy buds could be genetics, but my money is betting on the esoteric methods as the primary cause of what is seen here. Hey, if your goal was to make bubble hash, I bet this stuff exceeds expectations. That ice water will easily flow through the buds and efficiently knock off the trichomes. Keep doing whatever makes you happy, of course, but there is no circumventing the law of conservation of mass. You cannot manifest the extra carbon needed to make use of all that excess light. Atmospheric carbon alone will hit a ceiling for daily photosynthesis long before 60 DLI is reached. All the plant did was reduce aerial density of chlorophyl (or chloroplasts?) in leaves. It adapted to the excess light. Surviving does not mean it was a benefit. Can't make something from nothing. The amount of glucose produced from 65 DLI requires enough carbon ("limiting factor") and the atmosphere cannot provide that much under normal circumstances. Not only that, temperature and RH have to by tightly controlled to maximize daily photsynthetic potential too, if you want to try to make use of 60-65DLI. Gonna need 1300ppm co2 in the air. Even then, probably falls short of the theoretical maximum by some noticable amount.