soilless? get 10% runoff from each fertigation... should mitigate buildup.
EC isn't really accurate for assessing concnetration. It's "okay". It's useful for other things, too. But, there are multiple conversion factors that will give a 40% range in concentration estimates based on EC. A 40% variance is hardly a strong correlation. So, i'd worry more about what you see in the leaves or if you have familiarity with your EC readings, if they deviate from what you expect -- baselines formed while growing healthy plants without issues...
if religiously getting 10% runoff or more, it shouldn't be an issue in a soilless context.
without runoff, even if the plant absorbed 90% of the nutrient content, you just added a bunch more with the fertigation. Each cycle adding more. Over time that can add up to something relevant.
if this is soil.. give an extra plain-water irrigation between fertilizations... or similar to dilute.. a little runoff can have the same effect, too.
But again, if this is solely based on an EC rating as opposed to you knowing what to expect and it deviating, i'd wait to see issues in the plant. If the irrigation practices are deviating from norms, i'd correct those, first, before doing anything drastic
1) fully saturate - never choose the volume in a top-down mannner (whimsy). If it's soilless, religioulsy get 10% runoff or more
2) wait for appropriate dryback and repeat... simple..
Irrigation should be a reaction to observable things. this is no place for inductive reasoning. If fully saturating ever causes a problem, it is the fault of the medium and nothing else - Poorly constituted. Add more drainage amendment in future