Anybody tried the 42 fast bud, fast flower, photo....

Schafe1001
Schafe1001started grow question 1mo ago
Anybody tried the 42 fast bud, fast flower, photo.? Feminized, of course.
Solved
likes
Organoman
Organomananswered grow question 1mo ago
Nothing to be afraid of. Grow them wirh confidence.
1 like
Complain
Selected By The Grower
JUNGLE_B4RNS
JUNGLE_B4RNSanswered grow question 1mo ago
I’ve been part of there testing growers before commercialization. They are very interesting to grow. Once you switch to 12/12 cycle it goes very fast. I might suggest you to start mixing bloom nutrients in week 2 of 12/12 and keep giving vegetative nutrients until week 3 of 12/12.
1 like
Complain
Green_Claws
Green_Clawsanswered grow question 1mo ago
They do acually bud faster like they say on the tin
likes
Complain
DudeGrowsWeed
DudeGrowsWeedanswered grow question 1mo ago
I grew FB Wedding Cheesecake FF a couple of summers ago outdoors. Grew 7’ tall!!!👍👍
1 like
Complain
00110001001001111O
00110001001001111Oanswered grow question 1mo ago
"Fast" flowering, regardless of breeder is just a gimmick. I'd go with any non-fast version of the strain before doing a 'fast' version, but it wouldn't stop me from buying a strain i wanted, either, if all they had was a 'fast' strain. "Fast" strains are a gimmick. Especially the ones mixing in ruderalis genetics... Autoflowers have the same basic variable timeframe for flower phase as photoperiods. better off selecting photopoeriods with shorter flower phases in hopes of maximizing that trait in future generations. The difference is people count flower phase for each in vastly different ways, which accounts for the perception that autoflowers are somehow faster... No, they just have short vege phases and the first 1-2 weeks of flower are not recognized because of the limitations of using the naked eye. Easy to win a race when you don't count the first 1-2 weeks, bwahah.
1 like
Complain