Chat
RecommendedRecommended

Faroutman

Newbie
Message
Follow
2
4
Growing, years
EU
Region

Faroutman
@TheUk420Show, I didn't know that you use tap water. As I said, if you are putting 250ml of the HydroSol stock solutions into a 60ml reservoir, that should increase the EC by around 0.5. If your tap water is already around 0.4, that gets you up to around 0.9, which ties in with where you say your feed is at. I also use tap water. I find the Hydrocrop nutes work well with it. I do think there is some truth in what plant breeders claim about genetics, but it's often exaggerated. In my experience with plants like tomato (of which there are also hundreds of varieties), some take to hydro better than others, and some are naturally better yielding. If you choose a lower fruiting variety, you can try to optimise the feed all you want but it will never give the greatest yield; particularly if that variety doesn't much like hydro. But all the seed catalogues try to convince you that they have the best. I guess they have a living to make but it does annoy me when breeders make false promises. I know what a good tomato feed regime is. So I generally just try to pick varieties that perform well with it, rather than battling to get a crap variety to grow better! I think with plant nutrients it is more clear cut than with genetics, and easier to see through the BS. Compare it to human nutrition… If you have three kids, feed the first one rubbish, feed the second a balanced and healthy diet, feed the third premium ready meals and vitamin supplements. The first will grow up not too healthy. Whereas the other two will grow up EQUALLY healthy… but the third one will have cost way, way more to feed. I mean there is nothing wrong with the premium ready meals and vitamin supplements per se, but there is no discernible benefit either. Just fancy packaging, a bit of convenience and much more cost. Not sure that was the best analogy… But you know what I mean! Ready made liquid nutes and additives work fine, but you get the same standard of nutrition at far lower cost the way you are doing it.
Faroutman
@TheUk420Show, I'm not really able to advise on whether it's worthwhile trying to get a precise EC for each plant, because I've not grown cannabis. To be really sure you would need to grow two identical plants side by side, feed one precisely, feed the other less so, then see if there is much difference in growth and yield. I suspect some strains might tolerate a wide EC range, while others are more fussy. You should definitely keep the EC low for younger plants and increase as they age. Older plants tolerate, and need, a higher EC. My understanding is in veg cannabis generally likes an EC in the 1.0 to 1.5 range, and in flower 1.5 to 2.0. What I would say is that I have found the Hydrocrop nutes to be VERY forgiving. By that I mean I've often grown plants with the feed EC way off the ideal range without any deficiencies or nutrient burn. You're right that NPK are the major nutes, which plants use the most of, but plants grown without soil also need calcium and magnesium, plus micronutrients. All the micronutrients are in the B part of the HydroSol feed, so you need to be careful not to reduce part B too much. Personally, I would change your current 90ml of part B and 160ml of part A to more like 105ml B and 145ml A (switching round the other way in flower). It sounds like you are making up the two stock solutions correctly (by separately dissolving the dry nutes at 100g per litre of warm water). But I'm still confused about how much stock solution you are using in your feed. It seems to me that you are NOT using a lot. If you are using 90ml B + 160ml A (= 250ml total) in 60 litres of water you should be getting at EC of approx 0.5. Are you using tap water which is adding to the EC, and is your EC meter calibrated? It's good that you are measuring EC not PPM. As you probably know, PPM readings vary between meters because they do not all use the same scale. Your pH of 5.8 is ideal.