m0use

<span class="link_user">@tjaym</span>, Bwahah! The epitome of consistent reasoning, right here.

<span class="link_user">@MrBulldops</span>, Nah, don&#039;t let it ruin the fun if you want to make some.. quality over quantity :P

<span class="link_user">@MrBulldops</span>, They&#039;ll just make 5 accounts to post the same 25 memes each month Bwahah.

<span class="link_user">@cangrowz</span> , So you copied a portion of a question while also answering it, and that somehow recreated the missing portion of the original question beyond 280 character limit? Then, forgot to answer the question in any way while also telling them &#039;happy growing, growmie&#039; [sic]? Somehow the character limit of asking questions got applied to your solution and that&#039;s whay it&#039;s missing? Bwahah. None of that makes any sense and solutions don&#039;t have a character limit that small, if any, as I and others have written novellas before.. Looks like you removed the solution from the question, but the screenshot above clearly shows everything relevant.. growdiaries.com/grow-questions/92141-this-is-detailed-info-to-my-trail-and-error-first-diary

<span class="link_user">@cangrowz</span> , Bwaha, you use gemini to &#039;translate&#039; things... okay... Classic mobile copy/paste fail? That&#039;s ...absurd, lol. Can&#039;t copy text that doesn&#039;t exist. Copying or pasting does not cause a page to reload or react.. it&#039;s no different than typing something into a text input box in that regard. Could not recreate copying the text beyond the 280 character limit. It doesn&#039;t exist in that question page&#039;s source code, either. There&#039;s a another answer you give where the AI clearly misinterpreted the image.. It talks about seeing symptom low on the plant, but no symptoms can be seen low on the plant. A mistake no human would have made. Several other examples of inhuman answers, too. This guy is clearly cheating and giving lame excuses. He&#039;s very likely creating questions too, since that is the only way he&#039;d be able to copy the portion of the text that does not exist... unless he can read minds remotely. --- edited to reflect testing mobile app and multiple browsers on a phone in an attempt to recreate magically copying text that does not exist, lol, just for the sake of due diligence.

<span class="link_user">@cangrowz</span> , I&#039;m not stressed. What happened wasn&#039;t a glitch. It is not possible to copy text that didn&#039;t exist in the original question posted. The only way that would be possible is if you had access to the original text typed before it got truncated by the 280 character limit, which would also mean your script is creating questions with other accounts, too. I have a degree in CS, so i think i know how a simple copy/paste function works, bwahaha. Plus your answers are overtly inhuman.. Reacting/responding to things not shown in the picture, odd tangents, or not giving an answer at all... in the screenshot above all you typed was hello growmie, repeat the entire question - even the parts that don&#039;t exist - and then a stock goodbye phrase, lol... So you typed all of that, then didn&#039;t even answer the question in any way? Bwahah, quit gaslighting... it&#039;s not working..Are free seeds or a dumpy light really worth all that effort?

<span class="link_user">@cangrowz</span>, you gotta admit it does look a bit suspicious. Even I thought that it looked dodgy when I answered the question and thought how did you get the remainder of the question past its allocated amount of characters into your answer. But this site is buggy so you could have ended up with the non visible text into your copy from the question.

<span class="link_user">@cangrowz</span> , can&#039;t copy text that doesn&#039;t exist.. you can&#039;t just deny reality by saying otherwise. That is in no way a copy/paste glitch as you called it, lol. Only a completely computer illiterate person would believe that load of garbage. This is not a theory but an inevitable fact due to how a character limit works and how the copy/paste function works, lol. It does not manifest words out of the ether. Like i said.. few plausible possibilities. You either had access to the orginal text and copied it, or you are Gandelf the Grey.

<span class="link_user">@tjaym</span> , Ugh.. you keep twisting what was said and forming asinine arguments that are either fallacious or unrelated. Not replying to any of that tangential nonsense. I feel like i&#039;m in some sort of twilight zone episode, lol. It is 100% certain that we cannot copy and paste text that did not exist. The only way cangrowz could have copied text after the 280 character limit is if he/she had access to the original text or wrote it themself. This is not an opinion. Unless he/she is some sort of wizard... Is cangrowz a wizard? OMFG is cangrowz Gandelf?

<span class="link_user">@tjaym</span> , AI used as legitimate tool is not relevant to this thread. That&#039;s a strawman fallacy. Also, how is pointing out that someone is using AI to cheat the contest &quot;letting gd take over mylife?&quot; It&#039;s observable in an instant. Pretending to be polite while being condescending is a two-faced act. Go try to copy the portion of a question that was cut off by the 280 character limit. There are multiple opportunities to do so. That text doesn&#039;t exist. The only way he could have copied it is if he also wrote it or otherwise had access to the text before the question was submitted. Such behaviour has always been considered cheating by GD. People that engage in creating questions that they later answer on a different account has always been against the rules - written or not. Very possible something related is in the ToS, too. As to your reasoning, if i understand you correctly, it is acceptable for me to use AI to make a diary, image or video for any and all contests as long as it&#039;s how i want to do it and no specific rule against it? There may be a few holes in that rationalization. Here&#039;s a crazy idea: how about people just answer honestly or not submit ai-slop as their own work and instead try to earn it? What kind of mope passes on work as their own that they aren&#039;t even capable of doing? It&#039;s just sad and indefensible behaviour of a dubious character. You don&#039;t even need AI to place in this contest. Most of the regulars withdraw before the end of the month. You only need ~2 solutions to regularly place 3rd or higher. The cheaters have always spent more time and effort than what is required to &#039;win&#039; this contest. It&#039;s a bit laughable in that respect.

<span class="link_user">@GrowDiaries</span> So, this guy is clearly a bot, but my question is how did he copy/paste a truncated message.. They somehow got the text from beyond the 280 character limit. Did they also create the question? Is it somehow hidden and accessible despite being truncated? In either case, the script clearly screwed up and just copy/pasted the question as the solution and posted it. LOL, This is shady as fuck... Hey <span class="link_user">@cangrowz</span> , your script had a hiccup and outed you as a cheater. Might want to debug it a bit more.

<span class="link_user">@JUNGLE_B4RNS</span>, &quot;have no idea who you are dealing with&quot; -- more weird narcissistic nonsense. Who do you think you are? Bwahah, and why would I care? :&quot;...sceince , it doesn&#039;t work with me&quot; -- Bwahah, We can all see that. You&#039;d have to have some humility about your lack of education to recognize the value of generational knowledge. Instead you lean into your ignorance and think it&#039;s an advantage. Mass per area isn&#039;t science. It&#039;s a fraction. How can you possibly not understand what mass per area means as far as assessing yield? It&#039;s &quot;the&quot; metric to understand production. Assessing productivity would have to consider time invested, which i&#039;m sure you don&#039;t understand why and would argue obstinately about that too. You were all butthurt about when i flipped to flower. It was explained in the diary. Try reading. &quot;It&#039;s rootbound&quot; but also &quot;not enough roots&quot; despite drinking over 1 gallon per day and those two statements contradicting each other and reality. &quot;Yield is an epic fail,&quot; but it suprasses your own threshold for a good yield. Are any of your points of contention rational? The list of your contradictions, strawman arguments, and other nonsense is growing each time you type. Bwaha, I feel like i&#039;m in the twilight zone... This moronic equation you keep quoting: &quot;Yield is based on light watts x plants health x plants wattage,&quot; bwahah. How do you quantify &quot;plant health&quot; - feelings? Why doesn&#039;t it account for the variable efficacy of grow lights? Do you even understand what that word means? Why is 1g/watt the limit? How come this equation isn&#039;t the dreaded &quot; boogeyman science?&quot; Also, 1gram=1watt is a low bar to have as the maximum result. Do you know what a limit is? Probably not because &quot;education is for idiots that don&#039;t know nothing. Der Dee Der&quot; You and your half-wit army need to go back to school. That equation is lacking in numerous ways. It&#039;s toddler-level nonsense. &quot;Owning&quot; me? More self-absorbed bullshit. It&#039;s hard to take you seriously when you talk like a teenager. You being popular among some portion of half-wit anti-intellectuals doesn&#039;t carry the weight you think it does. You can be king of the retards. I&#039;m fine with that. You want a crown? You can have your childish last word. It&#039;s clear you are too obstinate to bother. You roll around in ignorance like a pig in shit.

<span class="link_user">@JUNGLE_B4RNS</span>, je ne vais pas me prendre la tête comme lui mais parle autrement au gens .le seul impolis ici c&#039;est toi !!! et justement on ne perd pas de temps avec des gens comme toi qui denigre les personnes en se croyant supérieurs, qui n&#039;a aucun savoir vivre et d&#039;ailleurs juste pour te faire comprendre se sera le premier et dernier message que tu aura mon temps et teop precieux pour le perdre avec toi