Just the waiting game now, residual evidence of an earlier ph problem but other than that the plants are progressing very nicely. I definitely have a favorite out of the two, I'm curious to know if the defoliation process is the major reason for the deviation in appearance between these two plants or if the phenotypes are really that different amongst these batches.. If you recall in entry 5 I left one alone and that just so happens to be the shorter stockier one, which in my eyes is the opposite effect of what I thought would have happened when I attacked the plant, my assumption was that the plant would go on the defensive once I defoliated and the growth would slow resulting in a shorter plant, the second factor that contributed to this thought process was the increase in light penetration, which would no doubt tell the plant that it doesn't need to stretch as aggressively, especially since I had the maximum par rating for the environment during that time. Even the reversed plant was tall and lanky and it was the other aggressively defoliated plant. It's not enough information to form a definitive answer Ill have to run quite a few more batches to really know what's up.
Maybe slight mutation in or a contributing factor knowen or unknown,
Definitely they all reacted differently. Reactions could be of process. Exciting diary none the less . Nice work, keep up the great ever surprising excursion. π
Thanks @Fast_Buds.
It's the first of many, big fan of your guys work you don't disappoint..
I hope you enjoy the pictures as well there are hundreds more coming!