they aren't... well they may be adding 3ec water, but that doesn't mean it all can fit in through the roots.
e.g. in soil-nutes, nitrogen needs to be further broken down by microbes before it can even enter the plant, but those larger molecules will still be contributing to Electrical Conductivity, even though it cannot enter the plant. so, the plant is taking in a lower concentration than what you added to the soil in that context.
the other reason -- frequency of application. if you look at a soilles/hydro context you feed all the time at same concentration - it matches metabolism of plant once you have it dialed in relative to your environemnt (no def or tox symptoms over time, even many months) sometimes it's good to get a little burn then back off, that way you know you are near the upper end of what it can handle.
anyway, in soil you often fertilize less often. so if you fertilize 1 a week, it will have to be a higher concentration than if you feed every single irrigation. some differences exist between soilless and soil context. you fertigate everytime but purpesfully get a 10% runoff to ensure you maintain the EC you feed between irrigations. any build up in plant is a result of the formula being too strong in this context. in soil, you water until the entire thing is wet and you may get runooff, but runoff is wasted nutes with no benefit (assumes everything is going well) in this context. when you give water only inbetween, it's just to keep minerals flowing vs any callibration or maintaining an equillibrium as you do in soilless.
the key takeaway here.. although feeding on demand is more optimal and will result in faster growth, you will for the most part give the same mass of N/P/K et al over time, relative to growth rate, as you would in the other growing methods... obviosuly, the methods that result in faster growth will use a bit more over time..
rates of change... rate of provision less rate of use... this is calculus, not addition and substration. feeding is simple, but also complicated :P