This qustion makes no sense.
If you have not flipped, all you have to do is give 14 hours or more of light... i'd stick to 15h or more to be safe, as a few plants will 'flip' with 10 hours of darkness. This is verifiable information you can look up with primary sources. This is what tehy teach in a plant biology class as opposed to often mistaken anecodote.
If you mean after you flip, it depends. 8% more DLI (12h to 13h, ceteris paribus) may or may not be worth the risk.. IF already near 35-40 dli, probably not worth doing it. If significantly below, might be worth the try.
The point at which a plant flips is variable. It is not the same for all plants. Some may flip to flower with 10 hours of darkness. some may need 11 or 12 hours of darkness. 13/11 should work with the vast majority of plants, but eventually you would run into one that will revege if you switch midstream or just not go into flower at all on 13/11.
since you are not in flower, you will not cause a re-vege. Try 13/11 and if they all start visibly forming buds in 7-10 days, it's obviously safe to use and you can eke out ~8% more DLI compared to 12/12.
Remember, the 35-40 dli value is not absolute, either. How well you control temperatures, rh and the ambient co2 will dictate "max" DLI. Local variables matter and make for a different "max" than other gardens. 35-40 is alos overshooting slightly in most cases. ... well, 40 is, and 35 is probably a smarter target to start. Because it is variable, you will need to observe and adjust based on plant growth -- too tight, needs less; too lanky, needs more. You don't want a plant with nodes stacked directly on top of each other blindly following some recommendation that isn't meant to be used so literally.
there'e's also lots of misinformation out there. PRoviding 50-55 DLI with ambient co2 is going to be a giant waste of electricity. This graph you posted is retarded. Also, i'd love to see the data with an appropriate sample size and control group that shows uo should give less and amp up over time... i have serious doubts about that hypotheses and only magnified by the suggestion to give 50-55 dli lol... probablly damage the plants.. and even if the plant adapted to that much light, it's not actually converting that excess light to sugar above what 35-40 dli would produce per day in the plant.
beware of 'initial' studies. 90% of initial studies fail to hold up to scrutiny. This gives a false sense that science flip-flops often, but in reality anyone more familiar knows to be incredibly skeptical of initial studes. they are not facts. they are a first step that is often flawed... or intentionally fucked up like that 11-person study from the UK that said vaccines are linked to autism. A total trash doctor with trash methodology paid to publish some trash research. It happens.