How to end the life of the plants ?

Ich lasse die Pflanzen erst 3 Tage austrocknen und dann für 72 Stunden im Dunkeln, damit die Pflanze Stress bekommt und dadurch mehr Harz produziert (klappt hervorragend) danach einfach abschneiden und zu Trocknen in die dunkle Box 🤙🏻

U trying to make it Halal?? just chop it and hang to dry. Numbers answer bring to light a lot of good points on how bro myths are stupid and most ppl have no idea WTF they talking about or doing and just go off on bias. Dr.BruceBugBee "cannabis researcher" said if anything blast em with 24's of light, but IMO not necessary. A good dry and cure will do it just fine, and can't turn shit genetics to AAAA from drying and curing.

yeah you can do that, there are many ways.. just test it out and see what works out for u i never have done that but just try bro,,,i heard ppl had greatresults this way.. shocking the plant with cold water is to let her think that winter is coming so she will finsh the buds quickly and mayb swell some more... idk.. but its not NEEDED for a great result.. just do what feels right u got this! goodluck👊

There are all sorts of wild beliefs. Few have taken the time and effort to prove anything. So, if you think whimsically doing something and putting blind faith into unsuppoorted conclusions about those behaviours, then, "bro-science" is right for you, lol. Go ahead and "shock" the plant with ice on the roots or burn the stem or stick a nail into or deprive them of light for long periods of time. fuck, you can even electrocute the soil, BWahahah. there is all sorts of fucking nonsense out there you can engage in if that's what get your rocks off. If a belief has been around for decades and has no evidence to support it, those people are some combination of lazy, stupid or disingenuous. Refusing to put any work into proving a hypothesis is a major red flag that what those people are selling is total bullshit. Take "flushing at end of cycle" hypothesis that is/was very popular. The reasons they gave initially were empirically proven false and what did the people who put faith into this concept do? They made up new reasons as to why it was still important and has some sort of positive effect. So, initially they said it reduces minerals in the flower - sounds fairly rational with zero foudnational knowledge. But, the plant has no excretion system for excess minerals. This would have mostly eliminated the possibility having a bit of plant biology education in the first place. Even so, they tested the plant material of buds that were flushed and compared to a control group of buds that were not flushed and there was no difference in mineral content. They also did blind taste tests that showed a slightly greater than 50% of people prefering the non-flushed bud flavor, lol. Which just means they had no fucking clue which was flushed and which was not. After that information came out, all of a sudden new reasons were given as to why you should flush before harvest, lol. It's like dealing with a toddler arguing about their bedtime. OVercome one objection and they just make shit up to continue arguing obstinately. With far too many people it's about what they do, not what the truth is. I've fallen for some bro-science bullshit before, and feel quite stupid when i realize the mistake i made, but that's the difference between a person who can adapt and evolve and one who cannot. Few will (begrudgingly) let go of a long-held belief in the face of better information. Most will cing to it because admitting it was wrong means they were retarded for potentially decades. they'd rather pretend its still real for the sake of their ego and personal perspective on how things work, even if erroneous. extended darkness - zero evidence cold-shocking roots - zero evidence stabbing the trunk with a nail - zero evidence spraying your plant with milk to combat wpm- zero evidence the list of such things is potentially endless because far fewer things are true than what imaginative people with a lack of edication can make up, lol. some common sense things from knowing a bit about biology/chemistry. Mass/energy is neither created or lost. What existed before must exist after any reaction/interaction though it may be in a new configuration. cell differntiation... This can relate to a bunch of the bro science nonsense out there. Energy is a currency in the plant. It powers all sorts of endothermic reactions that are necessary for molecule building and cell devision. So, depriving it of light will only slow or stop production of all things in the plant as any stores are used up... While still possible to have some sort of net positive due to evaporation rates and what not, it's a huge negative to overcome to create a net positive in some other way. Also, this can be measured and compared to control groups to prove it very easily, yet it is not done. Refusing to prove an easily proven thing is a red flag. Too often bro science is trying to say that a fastball thrown by a pitcher somehow speeds up after it leaves the pitcher's hand... what they say doesn't make sense relative to how the natural world works in a fundamental way. Reducing or limiting sugar production or co2 intake (see defoliation among other examples) is almost never goig to add up to a net positive for the plant. possibly, never.. but leaving the door open for some small, insignificant effect that might be true. Cell differentiaition - cells perform specific functions. they are not jack of all trades. e.g. sex organs are not storage facilities for minerals. Assuming that flowers get loaded up with minerals was retodded from the start, lol. For the record i fell for this too on first fwe grows. i flushed plants and allowed a fade to occur. Then i didn't and couldn't tell a difference. in fact the buds tasted better, sooner after drying than ever before, lol. NEver looked back. Accepted my retardation, adapted, and moved on. not understanding how sugar flows through the vascular tissue.. making it readily available all throughout the plant. any gradient differences are actually part of how it circulates. they are temporary and strive for equilibrium across memebranes. Apical dominance is why some buds form better than others. Taller or more 'primary' branching for lack of technical term will demand the most resources and get the most growth. You can cover up similar buds with similar dominance and they will absolutely develop the same as those getting a little light. Worrying abut light hitting plant surfaces with 1/100th of the chlorophyl aerial desnity is not something to worry about maximizing, lol. technically anything green on the plant can likely perform 'some' photosynthesis, but if there is 1/100th of the pigment present there's 1/100th or less of the photosynthesis ocurring.. 1/1000th in stems. My suggeston -- do things in a simple way until you see enough genetic variety to have a good grasp of that volatility before you do esoteric and weird shit. Then when you see the differences are no better or even posibly worse, you know it's just snake oil. The idea of 'boosting' p and k is another retarded urban myth. the only way it will do something positive is if you didn't feed enough p/k prior, lol. About 60% of p/k intake is by active tranasport. So the plant grabs what it needs on demand based on simple feedback loops. empirical studies show that feeding above a goldilocks zone for either has no impact on yield or potency. there are no "plant boosters" lol.. this is marketing nonsense selling falsehoods. you may need a slightly different ratio for vege vs flower, but it's nothing as extreme or simple as "boost pk and give no N" lol. life is a spectrum, not binary. if somethingn is presented as good vs bad or do this and magically good things happen, high probability someone is selling you some bullshit.

72 hours of darkness and In summary it signals to the plant, darkness can have a significant impact on enzyme activity in cannabis plants, senescence is the process of aging and decay in plants, triggered by various factors including darkness. It involves a series of changes, including chlorophyll breakdown, protein degradation, and nutrient remobilization. In response to darkness, plants reorganize their metabolism to conserve energy and resources. This includes the upregulation of enzymes involved in autophagy (the recycling of cellular components) and the downregulation of genes associated with photosynthesis. Autophagy is a conserved mechanism for the degradation of cellular contents in order to recycle nutrients or break down damaged or toxic material. Humans fast food at 72 hours autophagy begins. Plants fast light at 72 hours autophagy begins. Whether or not that 72 hours could be better spent is absolutely up for debate. But it is what it is. On a normal harvest that plant will hang drying for around 3 days in clone mode before the signal is received to begin autophagy. It is not beneficial to have a plant losing moisture content until the chloryphyll is broken down into small enough atoms to be attached to water molecules and released into the air. If the buds get too dry and the chloryphyll hasn't broken down yet then it stays in the plant where it can no longer be disposed of because there is no moisture content left to attach it to once small enough. Wouldn't take my word for it though, trust the science , trust that Katy Perry flew in space in a dildo shaped rocket.

There are many things that people do. But most of it isnt proven by science. id say try it out yourself and see how you like it compared to just harvesting. sometimes i do these things but not very often because im on perpetual but id say give it a try if you remember to. The best thing you can do is keep your drying area at 60% and your jars at 60% for as long as possible. This gives me the best end product at the end of the plants life