The dynamics of outdoors makes such things less than useful. Spread the plant out as best you can. That's all yo have to do. It is swimming in photons from all directions by comparison. So there is no need for a level canopy - merely expose as many leaves to the sun from any angle possible. That's all that is necessary in that regard.
This is about the distance from the sun. This relates to the inverse square law and how light spreads out over distance from the source. For simplicity, the example will deal with a single point of light and not an array of diodes as that makes the math messier but still applying the same way to each and every diode.
Essentially, a single-point light source indoors 18" away will be 1/4 the intensity at 2x the distance. Every time it doubles (n), it's another 1/(sq rt n). So, 54" (3 x 18) away would be 1/9th power compared to 18" distance.
Since the sun is 95million miles away, the difference from the top of the plant to the bottom of the plant is a miniscule distance relative to the total distance to the source and virtually no different in photons/s intensity top-to-bottom. Not only that, you get a lot of diffusion and such from the atmosphere, so even with less direct paths from the sun, many photons are reaching the leaves from indirect vectors. Even a 100' tall plant would be virtually the same amount of at top and bottom. 100 feet / (95 million miles x 5280 feet) is effectively nothing in this context. Fuck, even a 10,000 foot plant wouldn't be a difference in photons/s received. though atmospheric pressure will become a relevant factor at some point, unrelated to dynamics of the sun.
Hence, all the crap indoor growers have to worry about in regard to maximize light is not relevant to outdoor growing. Exposure is obviously still important, lol, but you get the gist, i hope.