00110001001001111O

@TherealNICOGREEN, I think the fake pictures go well with the marketing promises. One promise is vague and the other two are very likely false. The data used to come to those conclusions must be a total joke or completely fabricated.

I think you are in the wrong contest comment area, lol. who said i was old?

The strain catalog is probably not highly correlated to any plant labeled with a specific strain, but the problem is there's no regulation on how you name plants and the people invovled are uneducated science-deniers more times than not. So, you've bashed one psuedo-science and supported another psuedo-science. Etthos just makes up their own useless labels. Can't even stick to basics of mendellian genetics properly. They wouldn't recognize a punnet square if it slapped them in their face with their own genitals.

So, why are people ganging up on some new person asking a question about AI? LOL, bunch of middle school mean girls around here.

Even with clones, you should cycle out to younger plants or have a plan to do so. A clone is as old as the mother it was cut from. Over time, a female plant will start to produce 'hardened ovaries.' (or is it hardened ovules, doesn't matter what vocab is correct) These are not seeds, but they will ruin the taste of your flower. They taste like shit when they burn. You might mistake them as small seeds, and probably have seen them before if you've smoked long enough. Some plants don't even have to get old to have them. I had a gorilla glue x white widow from expert seeds have them from day 1. A grower once told me about them ~20 years ago. I then forgot about them until recently re-learned from a fellow grower ~5 years ago on GD. Older plants are more likely to produce them. Genetic age, not when the cuttings were taken. Not sure if extractions would be impacted. Anything burning it definitely will be tainted. Don't think an oil or alcohol used as a solvent would be noticeable, but can't assume. Could still absorb "something" extra, but less likely relevant, because ovaries (ovules?) are a pretty small proportion of total mass. i.e. can't add too much, which helps. Even clones likely have a time limitation for use. Maybe some plants avoid this issue, but still something to keep an eye on.

Do the truffle shuffle!

Squirrel tail? lol So, that just reminds me of a demi moore photo from the 1980s. If you know, you know.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oL2B-AAnsHo Whaaa, whaaa, whaaa... ffs... c'mon.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WnRzSHTrQtw Is youtube broken for everyone lately? LOL. "Rabble! Rabble! Rabble!"

Anyone receptive to instruction can start a soilless grow and have near-perfect results on the first grow. It really is that easy as long as they don't argue and try to do weird things that involve egos and e-peens. The cause and effect is predictable and transferable with little to no adjustments needed from one garden to the next. A water-only medium is just as simple as far as providing a well-balanced diet, but also have to learn how to avoid fouling your reservoir/buckets etc. Keep it clean and it's just as easy. Soil involves more trial and error - when you are learning or if you constitute your soil differently. Even if you don't change soil products, the consistency of that soil's nutrition is not always accurate or precise. More unknowns involved = more trial and error and more hiccups over time due to the lack of consistency / predictability. Not an opinion... The good thing is that once you 'mostly' figure it out, it's much easier going forward, especially if you use the same soil products each time. The short-term learning curve of soil is nothing in the long-run, so it shouldn't dissuade anyone from growing in soil. It really shouldn't matter which way you grow as long as systematic about improving your process, avoiding bro-science, and nonsense marketing promises (a.k.a. "marketing lies").

Becareful of these guys if you rely on discretion. I got a big ol' flashy weed postcard in the mail about 5 days after i visited their website. It was a while ago and can only hope they have corrected that behaviour.

These are not the droids you are looking for...

I like the new look. The video was just commentary on the mob. in addition to the cursor thing (directional keys move background instead of cursor in a text input box for the diary comment or picture label text input box), being able to zoom to full size picture would be nice to restore as it was before or even better.. variable zoom instead of just fit to size and "full size"

You can grow multiple strains and feed exactly the same with minimal to no nutrient deficiencies while hitting typical numbers you'd expect for ambient CO2, which means they are fed as well as oyu can feed them. Unless growing clones of 1 plant, most of these challenges are unavoidable when working with seeds. I think the greatest impediment is the preference to blame the plant when things don't go well. It's not that the formula is flawed, it's because the plant is picky. Too much inductive reasoning and blaming external sources. Proof is in the pudding. Either a formula works consistently or it does not. If it doesn't work well with minimal adjustments, the problem is the formula not the plants. "One challenge is that if you're going to switch to 12/12 for your photoperiod plants, then these autoflowers will get less light and that can mean less yield." -- This is not factual. Any competent grower of photoperiods would account for this change of operation hours. Switching from 18 hours requires 150% of the light over 12 hours (I go 16h to 12h, so it's only 133% more). Providing the same DLI over 12 hours will result in the sam yield as provided over 18hours. DLI is what matters. Hours of operation is only half the equation and insufficient alone to make such a statement. I run my lights at 75% over 16 hours and 100% over 12. this provides the same DLI. Technically, it might be 1% more DLI at 75% with a little better efficacy out of the diodes. Autoflowers would turn out just as they normally would, just as photoperiods yield fine under 12/12.

You’re*

Dora is 24 years old, so relax. Actually, even older. She was not born in 2000; just debuted in that year. So, she is at least 30, eh? Not to mention this is a fictitious character from a cartoon, BWAHAHA! We get it. You don't approve. https://youtu.be/LtxWR_KbwD0?t=16 @pengupoop come on really?