Dazed_And_Confused

@Fast_Buds, "the following MUST be present in your diaries" At least 5 photos per weekly update....uh. This is not present in the winning diary.

Yet again. Another contest that the winning entry did not follow all the rules. At least 5 photos per weekly update - This means every week right? Wrong. Its every week after the first couple. I understand the first couple weeks there is not much to see. But a rule is a rule. I had faith this time @Fast_Buds but yet again your words should be taken with a grain of salt.

@DYNOMYCO, Your highlighting 2 clones roots where the grower is doing the first application of your product. So both sets of roots have zero dynomyco in them? strange...Figured week 6 would be a better highlight. At least they dynomyco had 6 weeks to work it's magic.

@Miss_Greenthumbs_Garden, The problem is that @DYNOMYCO said it was fine to you but did not update the rules and inform any of the growers. Its like having a race but stating "No sandals". But then allowing a racer to wear sandals. I did it provide any advantage. Most likely no. But a rule is made to provide an even playing ground. If a rule gets changed all of the competitors should be aware of the change.

Yet another contest with winners that didn’t follow the rules. Great job @DYNOMYCO nice to see the winner used seeds when you specifically said cuttings “A minimum of 2 plants For your side-by-side you must use cuttings from the same strain” Also seems you were in a rush to finish the contest. Not a single plant has been harvested? The winner has one root shot and it looks to be pre-dynomyco application. I’m not convinced based on that diary since we all know seeds can have different phenotypes. From the looks of it the non-dynomyco plant had a more dominate sativa trait and grew taller and had less dense buds.