<span class="link_user">@Fast_Buds</span>, "the following MUST be present in your diaries" At least 5 photos per weekly update....uh. This is not present in the winning diary.
<span class="link_user">@DYNOMYCO</span>, Your highlighting 2 clones roots where the grower is doing the first application of your product. So both sets of roots have zero dynomyco in them? strange...Figured week 6 would be a better highlight. At least they dynomyco had 6 weeks to work it's magic.
<span class="link_user">@Miss_Greenthumbs_Garden</span>, The problem is that <span class="link_user">@DYNOMYCO</span> said it was fine to you but did not update the rules and inform any of the growers. Its like having a race but stating "No sandals". But then allowing a racer to wear sandals. I did it provide any advantage. Most likely no.
But a rule is made to provide an even playing ground. If a rule gets changed all of the competitors should be aware of the change.
Yet another contest with winners that didnāt follow the rules.
Great job <span class="link_user">@DYNOMYCO</span> nice to see the winner used seeds when you specifically said cuttings
āA minimum of 2 plants For your side-by-side you must use cuttings from the same strainā
Also seems you were in a rush to finish the contest. Not a single plant has been harvested? The winner has one root shot and it looks to be pre-dynomyco application. Iām not convinced based on that diary since we all know seeds can have different phenotypes. From the looks of it the non-dynomyco plant had a more dominate sativa trait and grew taller and had less dense buds.