Altitonans_Fulmen

<span class="link_user">@TruTraTri</span> , Just so you know, the plants are still very impressive, but it is not possible to harvest 1,300 grams (nearly 3 pounds) of dry cannabis from a single plant in a 2x2-foot tent. Literally physically spatially and energetically impossible to do so. Even with CO2, even with every bell and whistle cranked. I see very lovely fat buds full of nitrate right up to harvest. Dry cure can convert 10-15% of that at most if it&#039;s not sunk. Lo and behold, there is no soil to sink it, so you are smoking it as it will never oxidize, ever. Go do a Google search on the stability of nitrate as a molecule and what happens to it when you smoke it and how long it takes to break down. Most of my life is pushing plants past the limits of growth I&#039;m told is possible. Learning what a plant can and cannot do. Every glucose molecule it takes the plant to split 6 water molecules. 90% of a plant&#039;s water use is cooling. Transpiration is the elevator that drives nutrients where they need to be. EC dictates osmosis, which is a strong contributor to transpiration. Transpiration is the direct flow of water up and out of the plant. You expect me to believe he grew maxed-out CO2 while growing at 79f the entire grow? Makes it metabolically impossible. It is very distinctive what a plant looks like that&#039;s pushed to the limits and photo oxidative protection fails. Your plant looks very fat and full with nitrate. Impressive. But a couple extra KG just for ego. Either that, or we got some serious pgr&#039;s going on. . . Not trying to be a Richard, although I kinda am. After reading the diary, it kinda left a bad taste. Because what is seen is not what is claimed to be. Not because I want to shit on people. Genuinely wanted to know what his secrets were, to apply to my own grow, then I realized this guy is not recording or mentioning anything I&#039;d expect from a grow required to be &quot;dialed in&quot; and what is needed to push and to get above 65dli. No mention or understanding of carbon fixation. ETR coefficient expansion, E-par, Emerson Effect. Biochar. Average home grower runs around 2-3% efficiency when it comes to energy conversion. With a fully optimized setup dialed in, with the full 9 cardinal rules of plant growth all in unison, that efficiency can rise to 8%-12%. That&#039;s at the highest pharmaceutical grade of growing you can get. Diablero is asking to believe that he took the efficiency of the conversion to 40% + with nothing but Plagron nutes and dwc at 80F. With supposed full CO2 supplementation. Buds are still impressive nonetheless. The guy is talking like he is breaking world records for fun. Somehow he is breaking the law of Thermodynamics too and the law of Gibbs free energy. The thing is, these are not up for debate. No one can break the laws of thermodynamics or the rules of Gibbs free energy, because these core rules describe how all energy and heat work in our universe. Get it. What the world needs is more honesty. But hey, I&#039;m the bad guy. It&#039;s :+1:. I don&#039;t do sponsorship anyway. It&#039;s not about ego but integrity. You can&#039;t grow around telling people that you grew 1300g dry in 86 days with an autoflower. Need to convert 400 moles (400DLI) every cycle for 86 days to achieve what he wants us to believe. 5% of the entire dry matter of his plant is NPK, and carbon accounts for 46% of its dry matter. To make 1300g dry, he would need to use 9000 ppf for 12-18 hours to reach the carbon sequestration he is asking us to believe he made in 86 days. Sorry, that&#039;s insulting to my intelligence, and I suggest everyone make it insulting to theirs. Men always add a few inches; women generally half the body count. Sorry, but you are not walking around telling people you have a 4ft penis. Maybe 12-14&quot; inches if you&#039;re fortunate or cursed enough to have one that size, depending on how you look at it. Keep it within the realm of reality is all I&#039;m asking. Cannabis growth is exponential only until carbon dioxide assimilation, light intensity, or other environmental factors reach saturation. Beyond that limit, the rate of photosynthesis plateaus and growth becomes linear! LINEAR! Presenting himself, a grower who smashed the laws of the universe and discovered how to maintain exponential growth far beyond the limits of carbon assimilation- secrets only he knows- using Plagron nutrients and a metabolic temp of 75F, somehow managed to convert 400 dLI every day for an 86-day auto. Simpleminded: more watts = more yield; well, that only applies up to the light saturation point, where CO2 availability and the enzyme RuBisCO limit further conversion. Beyond this biological threshold, extra light energy cannot be processed. Pretending that you surpassed the plateau, without knowing that you are implying that you &quot;destroyed&quot; the linear plateau itself. As a grower who has, for 7 dedicated Kobe Bryant years, devoted studies in pushing plant growth towards that plateau barrier and overcoming each challenge that arises. I had hoped I could garner some insight into achieving something myself that I have not tried, given his numbers were masssssssiveee. Alas, my disappointment, good sir; I smelt the familiar sniffings of &quot;Bull-shit&quot;. Don&#039;t blame me if I&#039;m not scared to call it out; there is a reason I&#039;m not sponsored, and it has nothing to do with my ability to grow.

<span class="link_user">@TruTraTri</span> , Just so you know, the plants are still very impressive, but it is not possible to harvest 1,300 grams (nearly 3 pounds) of dry cannabis from a single plant in a 2x2-foot tent. Literally physically spatially and energetically impossible to do so. Even with CO2, even with every bell and whistle cranked. I see very lovely fat buds full of nitrate right up to harvest. Dry cure can convert 10-15% of that at most if it&#039;s not sunk. Lo and behold, there is no soil to sink it, so you are smoking it as it will never oxidize, ever. Go do a Google search on the stability of nitrate as a molecule and what happens to it when you smoke it and how long it takes to break down. Most of my life is pushing plants past the limits of growth I&#039;m told is possible. Learning what a plant can and cannot do. Every glucose molecule it takes the plant to split 6 water molecules. 90% of a plant&#039;s water use is cooling. Transpiration is the elevator that drives nutrients where they need to be. EC dictates osmosis, which is a strong contributor to transpiration. Transpiration is the direct flow of water up and out of the plant. You expect me to believe he grew maxed-out CO2 while growing at 79f the entire grow? Makes it metabolically impossible. It is very distinctive what a plant looks like that&#039;s pushed to the limits and photo oxidative protection fails. Your plant looks very fat and full with nitrate. Impressive. But a couple extra KG just for ego. Either that, or we got some serious pgr&#039;s going on. . . Not trying to be a Richard, although I kinda am. After reading the diary, it kinda left a bad taste. Because what is seen is not what is claimed to be. Not because I want to shit on people. Genuinely wanted to know what his secrets were, to apply to my own grow, then I realized this guy is not recording or mentioning anything I&#039;d expect from a grow required to be &quot;dialed in&quot; and what is needed to push and to get above 65dli. No mention or understanding of carbon fixation. ETR coefficient expansion, E-par, Emerson Effect. Biochar. Average home grower runs around 2-3% efficiency when it comes to energy conversion. With a fully optimized setup dialed in, with the full 9 cardinal rules of plant growth all in unison, that efficiency can rise to 8%-12%. That&#039;s at the highest pharmaceutical grade of growing you can get. Diablero is asking to believe that he took the efficiency of the conversion to 40% + with nothing but Plagron nutes and dwc at 80F. With supposed full CO2 supplementation. Buds are still impressive nonetheless. The guy is talking like he is breaking world records for fun. Somehow he is breaking the law of Thermodynamics too and the law of Gibbs free energy. The thing is, these are not up for debate. No one can break the laws of thermodynamics or the rules of Gibbs free energy, because these core rules describe how all energy and heat work in our universe. Get it. What the world needs is more honesty. But hey, I&#039;m the bad guy. It&#039;s :+1:. I don&#039;t do sponsorship anyway. It&#039;s not about ego but integrity. You can&#039;t grow around telling people that you grew 1300g dry in 86 days with an autoflower. Need to convert 400 moles (400DLI) every cycle for 86 days to achieve what he wants us to believe. 5% of the entire dry matter of his plant is NPK, and carbon accounts for 46% of its dry matter. To make 1300g dry, he would need to use 9000 ppf for 12-18 hours to reach the carbon sequestration he is asking us to believe he made in 86 days. Sorry, that&#039;s insulting to my intelligence, and I suggest everyone make it insulting to theirs. Men always add a few inches; women generally half the body count. Sorry, but you are not walking around telling people you have a 4ft penis. Maybe 12-14&quot; inches if you&#039;re fortunate or cursed enough to have one that size, depending on how you look at it. Keep it within the realm of reality is all I&#039;m asking. Cannabis growth is exponential only until carbon dioxide assimilation, light intensity, or other environmental factors reach saturation. Beyond that limit, the rate of photosynthesis plateaus and growth becomes linear! LINEAR! Presenting himself, a grower who smashed the laws of the universe and discovered how to maintain exponential growth far beyond the limits of carbon assimilation- secrets only he knows- using Plagron nutrients and a metabolic temp of 75F, somehow managed to convert 400 dLI every day for an 86-day auto. Simpleminded: more watts = more yield; well, that only applies up to the light saturation point, where CO2 availability and the enzyme RuBisCO limit further conversion. Beyond this biological threshold, extra light energy cannot be processed. Pretending that you surpassed the plateau, without knowing that you are implying that you &quot;destroyed&quot; the linear plateau itself. As a grower who has, for 7 dedicated Kobe Bryant years, devoted studies in pushing plant growth towards that plateau barrier and overcoming each challenge that arises. I had hoped I could garner some insight into achieving something myself that I have not tried, given his numbers were masssssssiveee. Alas, my disappointment, good sir; I smelt the familiar sniffings of &quot;Bull-shit&quot;. Don&#039;t blame me if I&#039;m not scared to call it out; there is a reason I&#039;m not sponsored, and it has nothing to do with my ability to grow.

<span class="link_user">@MonyetDiablero</span> , I grow the way nature and God intended; I only add water. Not sure what you even mean by the right way. Wish you the best with future grows. You are absolutely correct; I am a nobody and nothing, but I am what I am and don&#039;t pretend to be something I&#039;m not.

<span class="link_user">@Altitonans_Fulmen</span>, then you should learn to grow the right way or try a different breeder . My sponsers <span class="link_user">@Patricia_Zamnesia</span> & <span class="link_user">@Kannabia</span> have good genetics ,however i dont think they will suit you as they are polite unlike you . If a body builder can lift more than a normal human person he or she doesnt necessary had steroïde s . Basically you telling me that i im not able to read numbers while its just you that doesnt see what your own plants are telling you and that is that they are not happy together in your grow space as they all need different attention. You can write what you want and where you want ,but for me you ar a nobody from the first moment i read the first line you commented.

<span class="link_user">@TruTraTri</span> , Just so you know, the plants are still very impressive, but it is not possible to harvest 1,300 grams (nearly 3 pounds) of dry cannabis from a single plant in a 2x2-foot tent. Literally physically spatially and energetically impossible to do so. Even with CO2, even with every bell and whistle cranked. I see very lovely fat buds full of nitrate right up to harvest. Dry cure can convert 10-15% of that at most if it&#039;s not sunk. Lo and behold, there is no soil to sink it, so you are smoking it as it will never oxidize, ever. Go do a Google search on the stability of nitrate as a molecule and what happens to it when you smoke it and how long it takes to break down. Most of my life is pushing plants past the limits of growth I&#039;m told is possible. Learning what a plant can and cannot do. Every glucose molecule it takes the plant to split 6 water molecules. 90% of a plant&#039;s water use is cooling. Transpiration is the elevator that drives nutrients where they need to be. EC dictates osmosis, which is a strong contributor to transpiration. Transpiration is the direct flow of water up and out of the plant. You expect me to believe he grew maxed-out CO2 while growing at 79f the entire grow? Makes it metabolically impossible. It is very distinctive what a plant looks like that&#039;s pushed to the limits and photo oxidative protection fails. Your plant looks very fat and full with nitrate. Impressive. But a couple extra KG just for ego. Either that, or we got some serious pgr&#039;s going on. . . Not trying to be a Richard, although I kinda am. After reading the diary, it kinda left a bad taste. Because what is seen is not what is claimed to be. Not because I want to shit on people. Genuinely wanted to know what his secrets were, to apply to my own grow, then I realized this guy is not recording or mentioning anything I&#039;d expect from a grow required to be &quot;dialed in&quot; and what is needed to push and to get above 65dli. No mention or understanding of carbon fixation. ETR coefficient expansion, E-par, Emerson Effect. Biochar. Average home grower runs around 2-3% efficiency when it comes to energy conversion. With a fully optimized setup dialed in, with the full 9 cardinal rules of plant growth all in unison, that efficiency can rise to 8%-12%. That&#039;s at the highest pharmaceutical grade of growing you can get. Diablero is asking to believe that he took the efficiency of the conversion to 40% + with nothing but Plagron nutes and dwc at 80F. With supposed full CO2 supplementation. Buds are still impressive nonetheless. The guy is talking like he is breaking world records for fun. Somehow he is breaking the law of Thermodynamics too and the law of Gibbs free energy. The thing is, these are not up for debate. No one can break the laws of thermodynamics or the rules of Gibbs free energy, because these core rules describe how all energy and heat work in our universe. Get it. What the world needs is more honesty. But hey, I&#039;m the bad guy. It&#039;s :+1:. I don&#039;t do sponsorship anyway. It&#039;s not about ego but integrity. You can&#039;t grow around telling people that you grew 1300g dry in 86 days with an autoflower. Need to convert 400 moles (400DLI) every cycle for 86 days to achieve what he wants us to believe. 5% of the entire dry matter of his plant is NPK, and carbon accounts for 46% of its dry matter. To make 1300g dry, he would need to use 9000 ppf for 12-18 hours to reach the carbon sequestration he is asking us to believe he made in 86 days. Sorry, that&#039;s insulting to my intelligence, and I suggest everyone make it insulting to theirs. Men always add a few inches; women generally half the body count. Sorry, but you are not walking around telling people you have a 4ft penis. Maybe 12-14&quot; inches if you&#039;re fortunate or cursed enough to have one that size, depending on how you look at it. Keep it within the realm of reality is all I&#039;m asking. Cannabis growth is exponential only until carbon dioxide assimilation, light intensity, or other environmental factors reach saturation. Beyond that limit, the rate of photosynthesis plateaus and growth becomes linear! LINEAR! Presenting himself, a grower who smashed the laws of the universe and discovered how to maintain exponential growth far beyond the limits of carbon assimilation- secrets only he knows- using Plagron nutrients and a metabolic temp of 75F, somehow managed to convert 400 dLI every day for an 86-day auto. Simpleminded: more watts = more yield; well, that only applies up to the light saturation point, where CO2 availability and the enzyme RuBisCO limit further conversion. Beyond this biological threshold, extra light energy cannot be processed. Pretending that you surpassed the plateau, without knowing that you are implying that you &quot;destroyed&quot; the linear plateau itself. As a grower who has, for 7 dedicated Kobe Bryant years, devoted studies in pushing plant growth towards that plateau barrier and overcoming each challenge that arises. I had hoped I could garner some insight into achieving something myself that I have not tried, given his numbers were masssssssiveee. Alas, my disappointment, good sir; I smelt the familiar sniffings of &quot;Bull-shit&quot;. Don&#039;t blame me if I&#039;m not scared to call it out; there is a reason I&#039;m not sponsored, and it has nothing to do with my ability to grow.

<span class="link_user">@TruTraTri</span> , Just so you know, the plants are still very impressive, but it is not possible to harvest 1,300 grams (nearly 3 pounds) of dry cannabis from a single plant in a 2x2-foot tent. Literally physically spatially and energetically impossible to do so. Even with CO2, even with every bell and whistle cranked. I see very lovely fat buds full of nitrate right up to harvest. Dry cure can convert 10-15% of that at most if it&#039;s not sunk. Lo and behold, there is no soil to sink it, so you are smoking it as it will never oxidize, ever. Go do a Google search on the stability of nitrate as a molecule and what happens to it when you smoke it and how long it takes to break down. Most of my life is pushing plants past the limits of growth I&#039;m told is possible. Learning what a plant can and cannot do. Every glucose molecule it takes the plant to split 6 water molecules. 90% of a plant&#039;s water use is cooling. Transpiration is the elevator that drives nutrients where they need to be. EC dictates osmosis, which is a strong contributor to transpiration. Transpiration is the direct flow of water up and out of the plant. You expect me to believe he grew maxed-out CO2 while growing at 79f the entire grow? Makes it metabolically impossible. It is very distinctive what a plant looks like that&#039;s pushed to the limits and photo oxidative protection fails. Your plant looks very fat and full with nitrate. Impressive. But a couple extra KG just for ego. Either that, or we got some serious pgr&#039;s going on. . . Not trying to be a Richard, although I kinda am. After reading the diary, it kinda left a bad taste. Because what is seen is not what is claimed to be. Not because I want to shit on people. Genuinely wanted to know what his secrets were, to apply to my own grow, then I realized this guy is not recording or mentioning anything I&#039;d expect from a grow required to be &quot;dialed in&quot; and what is needed to push and to get above 65dli. No mention or understanding of carbon fixation. ETR coefficient expansion, E-par, Emerson Effect. Biochar. Average home grower runs around 2-3% efficiency when it comes to energy conversion. With a fully optimized setup dialed in, with the full 9 cardinal rules of plant growth all in unison, that efficiency can rise to 8%-12%. That&#039;s at the highest pharmaceutical grade of growing you can get. Diablero is asking to believe that he took the efficiency of the conversion to 40% + with nothing but Plagron nutes and dwc at 80F. With supposed full CO2 supplementation. Buds are still impressive nonetheless. The guy is talking like he is breaking world records for fun. Somehow he is breaking the law of Thermodynamics too and the law of Gibbs free energy. The thing is, these are not up for debate. No one can break the laws of thermodynamics or the rules of Gibbs free energy, because these core rules describe how all energy and heat work in our universe. Get it. What the world needs is more honesty. But hey, I&#039;m the bad guy. It&#039;s :+1:. I don&#039;t do sponsorship anyway. It&#039;s not about ego but integrity. You can&#039;t grow around telling people that you grew 1300g dry in 86 days with an autoflower. Need to convert 400 moles (400DLI) every cycle for 86 days to achieve what he wants us to believe. 5% of the entire dry matter of his plant is NPK, and carbon accounts for 46% of its dry matter. To make 1300g dry, he would need to use 9000 ppf for 12-18 hours to reach the carbon sequestration he is asking us to believe he made in 86 days. Sorry, that&#039;s insulting to my intelligence, and I suggest everyone make it insulting to theirs. Men always add a few inches; women generally half the body count. Sorry, but you are not walking around telling people you have a 4ft penis. Maybe 12-14&quot; inches if you&#039;re fortunate or cursed enough to have one that size, depending on how you look at it. Keep it within the realm of reality is all I&#039;m asking. Cannabis growth is exponential only until carbon dioxide assimilation, light intensity, or other environmental factors reach saturation. Beyond that limit, the rate of photosynthesis plateaus and growth becomes linear! LINEAR! Presenting himself, a grower who smashed the laws of the universe and discovered how to maintain exponential growth far beyond the limits of carbon assimilation- secrets only he knows- using Plagron nutrients and a metabolic temp of 75F, somehow managed to convert 400 dLI every day for an 86-day auto. Simpleminded: more watts = more yield; well, that only applies up to the light saturation point, where CO2 availability and the enzyme RuBisCO limit further conversion. Beyond this biological threshold, extra light energy cannot be processed. Pretending that you surpassed the plateau, without knowing that you are implying that you &quot;destroyed&quot; the linear plateau itself. As a grower who has, for 7 dedicated Kobe Bryant years, devoted studies in pushing plant growth towards that plateau barrier and overcoming each challenge that arises. I had hoped I could garner some insight into achieving something myself that I have not tried, given his numbers were masssssssiveee. Alas, my disappointment, good sir; I smelt the familiar sniffings of &quot;Bull-shit&quot;. Don&#039;t blame me if I&#039;m not scared to call it out; there is a reason I&#039;m not sponsored, and it has nothing to do with my ability to grow.