Autos vs Photos

I just don’t think there’s any equivalency with autos.. they’re close but inferior. And I don’t see how they’re that much faster. I veg for 4 weeks and flower in 8. 12 weeks I’ve got at least twice as much as I’d have from an auto that takes 9-10 weeks at least - a lot of the time more like 12 weeks anyhow. Look at most ppls auto diaries they stretch to 12,13,14 weeks. Anyways in my experience terps are superior IMO, and thc definitely has higher ceiling in photos.

I personally think autos are slowly takeing over especially fastbuds. Autos are a lot easier to grow and a lot faster and a company like fastbuds have really strong autos if grown properly. Photoperiode plants in my experience take a lot longer. But if u can make clones from a mother it will speed process up

Thank you mate but it's just about the taste and the phenotypes. I know autos are not that 100 % quality like a strong genetic photos, but like I said, I growed the Bluedream from Fastbuds and this strain was the best weed I ever tasted. So now my question is when I grow a photo strain like Bluedream is there a higher Thc level and a stronger taste?

Cost of grow and yields. However yields are getting better, the cost will still be more due to more hours of electricity used. Autos are pointless to clone.