Anyone who responds to my questions being condescending prick for no reason can seriously fuck off?

Is this in reference to the previous question? You asked people their opinion on the usefulness of bee pollen - an untested, hypothetical beneficial product for plants. I'd be more worried if the general response was without skepticism. I'd also point out that any small effect from any product or behaviour will be nearly impossible to distinguish from notmal volatility of results. Working with the same clones would be a slightly different context but still difficult to be confident about any one factor's impact. More often, people will assume what they prefer.. they will assume any positive thing they observe is the effect of the new product or behaviour. This is why anecdote demands skepticism. It's not impossible that bee pollen could be beneficial, but it's unlikely, and a few plants at home from seed will have too much fog of war to be confident about any conclusions except for things with profound effects... Nothing wrong with doing what you want to do regardless of existing evidence, either. if some empirical evidence does esists, can't fault others for not being aware of it. i'd wager testing of bee pollen in this way is fairly rare/obscure.