Some formulas are better than others, even if they work well seed to harvest with "a" plant, it may not be the same with others.
A 1-1-2 NPK ratio and 4-2-1 K:Ca:Mg is what research says works best -- at ~6.0 pH, give or take a couple tenths.
Compare what you are mixing up and consider trying this.. These are ballpark numbers. My weighted average %of mass ratios for these things is
8.1% N / 8.9% P / 14.2% K / 7.2% Ca / 3.9% Mg -- you can see these are not exactly those ratios but are close. I almost never see a plant with tox or deficiency symptoms no matter how many strains I am growing off the same reservoir and across 5 years of use, so far. Some small thngs can happen, but the progress slow and easy to correct. these minor corrections for 1 plant have not caused an issue with others, so far.
PPMs
120s
60
180+
100+
50-80
this would be a light 1.2-1.3 concentration with 100ppm give or take of S. The ratios shouldn't need much adjustment, but overall concentration may. e.g. if you use co2 and tightly control environment etc etc.. can' probably feed higher concentration than a less environmentally-controlled grow. More light will increase metabolism to a point, too, which would result in a greater need for building blocks per day to match growth rate.
A plant with esoteric nutrient needs is a reflection of a shitty breeder, imo, relative to a formula that works for 95% of plants i've ever grown. 1/20... that's just poor selection of plants with shit-ass traits in regard to feeding... probably for some superficial trait that has nothing to do with bud quality, LOL like what color the leaves change in senescence or what looks prettier for a picture on the internet in lieu of traits of more importance, like unusual sensitivities to one or more ingredients in ferts.
Not saying that is what you have.. if your formula is drastically different, i'd wager it has more to do with the formula of that nutrient system. While the ingredients are commodities of no differing qualities, some follow existing knowledge base and some think they are better than generational knowledge just because 'this' formula worked for some grower that is not popular.. read about hte se various "inert name"'s formula... all they had to do was look up existing knowledge and save a whole lot of effort.