Red Light and its Impact on Plant Growth
Choosing the optimal lighting for cannabis cultivation can be challenging. There are many factors to consider, like light intensity, distribution, and spectrum. Spectrum can be especially complicated because there is a lot of conflicting information out there. This article is going to take a research-based approach to evaluate the spectrum and is part of a series exploring the effect of the spectrum on plants. This post will focus on our knowledge of red light and its effect on plant growth and reproduction (flowering). Red (R) light is radiation with wavelengths between 620 and 750 nm. These wavelengths are within the visible spectrum and red light has a pronounced effect on both photosynthesis and flowering.
Vegetative Growth
Red light fits with the absorption peak of chlorophylls, which do photosynthesis to produce sugars and carbons. Sugars and carbons are the building blocks for plant cells. Because red wavelengths are highly absorbed by chlorophyll, they also increase the photosynthesis rate and plant size [1]. Furthermore, red radiation at 690 nm may be more effective than 660 nm for increasing plant size [2]. Although a plant can be grown using just red light, it’s not a good idea. Most plants will have faster growth with a full-spectrum light source. Plants grown with red wavelengths alone often get skinny, stretched stems (“etiolation”) with fewer leaves [3].
Ideally, red wavelengths should be provided in combination with blue (B) light and other colors as well. The R+B combination results in a faster rate of photosynthesis compared to R or B light alone. Compared to just red radiation, the red-blue combination increases plant size, leaf number, leaf size, and chlorophyll content [4, 5]. How much red and blue light is needed for cannabis plants? One way to answer this question is to test what ratio of R:B light is ideal. Depending on the species the ideal R:B ratio varies. A higher R:B ratio increases biomass in tomato, strawberries, and marigolds [4 – 6]. Early research in cannabis suggests that a higher R:B ratio may increase plant height [7]. On the other hand, higher levels of blue light compared to red are documented to increase biomass [8]. The addition of other colors of light, especially green (G), further benefits plant growth. For example, a combination of R+B+G light increases plant size and height, and leaf size compared to a R+B alone [9].
Root Growth
Some research has shown that red light can also impact root number and length, however, this is still a relatively unexplored area. Grape plants grown with red radiation produce a greater number of roots compared to plants grown under far-red or blue light [10]. Tomato plants grown with red LED light alone produce more and longer roots compared to white, far-red, or blue light [10].
Flowering
Red wavelengths also impact the timing of flowering, the duration of flowering, the weight and number of flowers produced, and possibly THC and CBD content.
Flowering time is in part regulated by the amount of red and far-red (750 – 780 nm) light available to the plant [11]. The effect of red radiation on flowering time is species-specific. For example, red wavelengths accelerates flowering in cranberry, wheat, and strawberry but delays flowering in mustard plants [12 – 15].
Red light can also impact the number and weight of flowers produced. Marigold plants produce five times more flowers when grown with fluorescent light supplemented with red light [16]. Early research in cannabis suggests that plants grown with high amounts of red (HPS) light produce more flowers [17]. In that same study, cannabis plants receiving high amounts of red wavelengths also produced less THC, CBD, THCV, CBG, and cannabinoids compared to plants grown under spectrums with more blue light [17].
Learn More
Shimizu, H. et al. Light environment optimization for lettuce growth in plant factory (2011).
Singh, D. et al. LEDs for Energy Efficient Greenhouse Lighting (2015).
Samuolienė, G. et al. The impact of red and blue light-emitting diode illumination on radish physiological indices. Cent. Eur. J. Biol. 6, 821–828 (2011).
Ouzounis, T. et al. Blue and red LED lighting effects on plant biomass, stomatal conductance, and metabolite content in nine tomato genotypes. Proc. VIII Int. Symp. Light Hortic. 8, (2016).
Naznin, M. T. et al. Using different ratios of red and blue LEDs to improve the growth of strawberry plants. Proc. VIII Int. Symp. Light Hortic. 8, 125–130 (2016).
Sams, C. E., Kopsell, D. & Morrow, R. C. Light quality impacts on growth, flowering, mineral uptake and petal pigmentation of marigold. Proc. VIII Int. Symp. Light Hortic. 8, 139–145 (2016).
Hernandez, R., Eguchi, T. & Kubota, C. Growth and morphology of vegetable seedlings under different blue and red photon flux ratios using light-emitting diodes as sole-source lighting. Proc. VIII Int. Symp. Light Hortic. 8, (2016).
Wu, M. C. et al. A novel approach of LED light radiation improves the antioxidant activity of pea seedlings. Food Chem. 101, 1753–1758 (2007).
Wang, Y. & Folta, K. M. Contributions of green light to plant growth and development. Am. J. Bot. 100, 70–78 (2013).
Vu, et al. Influence of short- term irradiation during pre-and post-grafting period on the graft-take ratio and quality of tomato seedlings. Hortic. Environ. Biotechnol. 55, 27–35 (2014).
Cerdan and Chory. Regulation of flowering time by light quality. Nature. 6942, 881 – 885 (2003).
Zhou, Y. & Singh, B. R. Red light stimulates flowering and anthocyanin biosynthesis in American cranberry. Plant Growth Regul. 38, 165–171 (2002).
Kasajima, S. et al. Effect of Light Quality on Developmental Rate of Wheat under Continuous Light at a Constant Temperature. Plant Prod. Sci. 10, 286–291 (2007).
Yoshida, H. et al. Effects of varying light quality from single-peak blue and red light-emitting diodes during nursery period on flowering, photosynthesis, growth, and fruit yield of everbearing strawberry. Plant Biotechnol. 33, 267–276 (2016).
Eskins, K. Light-quality effects on Arabidopsis development. Red, blue and far-red regulation of flowering and morphology. Physiol. Plant. 86, 439–444 (1992).
Eichhorn B., et al. An Update on Plant Photobiology and Implications for Cannabis production. Front. in Plant Science 10 (2019).
Magagnini G. et al. The Effect of Light Spectrum on the Morphology and Cannabinoid Content of Cannabis sativa L. 1, 19 – 27 (2018).
@Ultraviolet, it looked a bit pink-ish to me. Some photographers use wavelengths during the shot that bring out certain features. The composite photos made out of different wavelengths are quite pretty.
@NegotiatedBubble, Urm I harvested the main flowers and left a few popcorn nugs at the bottom of the plant then put it back to veg, the bottom pictures are taken under a full spectrum lighting 400-700nm, heavily damaged from UV exposure PH tomfoolery.
An excellent article on Blue.
Many Thanks. Since I started playing with the other colours its nice to see the info getting out there. I'm completely convinced with adding more of the spectrum.
I would love to see a well controlled comparative grow between with and without adding the blue or extra colours using a typical grow light like from Spider Farm or similar as a base.
And thanks for all the links to those papers.
@TheFattyMcCoy, These are some clones from a previous grow, was meant to be a comparison between monster-cropped clones at varying stages of flower but they at this stage are growing equally well I can't tell the difference tbh.