Germination update --
#2 sprouted Jan 20
#1 sprouted Jan 21
re-planted #3... twice, third time is the charm it turns out.
Fertilize first irrigation and on with 10% or more runoff. I don't feed heavily. It merely maintains a consistently fertile environement.
So, what went wrong? Tap water change pH out of nowhere from a steady 8.4 to ~7. Add to that the new substrate i mixed up is more acidic than expected. These two factors comounded for a pH near or below 5. Third seed was given a proper environemnt and it sprouted in a healthy manner. This was laziness, but positive note is i am re-stocked on pH strips. Had just enough to test tap and runoff of a few pots.
I've gone back to a promix / vermiculte mix. Four parts of the promix BX and three parts extra coars vermiculite. This ends up being the 50/50 peat : vermiculite+perlite ratio that i want. It's fluffier, it holds more water, pH balanced, and i don't have to do anything but mix it up. KISS - i deviated without significant potential for benefit. very stupid
About grow:
Some autoflowers in max PPFD relative to ambient environment -- I do not control for VPD nor add CO2. I do avoid any temps below 68F. We'll go seed-to-harvest under a ViparSpectra XS1500 LED grow light in a 36" by 36" by 60" grow tent.
Seeds were sown directly into substrate. A simply mix of sphagnum and vermiculte, so this is a Soilless grow. It makes use of simple methods. I fertilize the same mix of balanced nutes from beginning until the end with 10% or greater runoff. Runoff goes down drain, or I toss it outside in warmer months. This maintains proper concentrations in the substrate. Each time i fertilize, it resets this concentration as long as I adhere to the excess runoff to waste. Virtually impossible to overwater or overnute a plant if you stick to a simple wet-dry cycle. Top inch or so dries before I repeat irrigation. Keeps roots driving down to moister areas insted of the surface and helps avoid pests and bad microbial growth to some extent. These are not guarnatees but related to probability and risk.
I will react to any individual plant's needs in regard to nutrients. Minor adjustments might be made per plant based on how it reacts. Few plants operate outside of a normal balanced mix. My lack of environmental control does inevitably lead to a slightly ever-changing needs of plants to some small degree relative to ever-changing environmental variables.
Know what you feed and stick to good irrigation haibits relative to your growing methods.. makes diagnosing problems much simpler.
---------------------------------------------
About Lights
Hello, folks...
This light was sent to me by ViparSpectra. It looks like an excellent light for the price point. They used the most efficient 'white' LED diodes (LM301). They come in both 3000K and 5000K varieties. The average is around 3600K, so it should do you well in both vegetative phase and bloom phase. The 5000k will promot branching early and 3000k will promote bud development late. It also includes diodes for 660nm and 760nm wavelengths (far red and infrared). Meanwell drivers are a well known brand with good efficiency. It has a quality heatsink, too. This is an excellent light that can take you from seed to harvest and produce high quality buds.
8% Coupon Code - XSNobodyBud
Note, my screen name is slightly different. Use any code you find for that matter. There are several out there. There are no commissions invovled with this particular code, but I did receive a free light. Nonetheless, I'm an honest guy about this stuff.
Amazon US:
XS1500 https://amzn.to/3aD5ef2
XS2000 https://amzn.to/3iVUU4J
XS4000 https://amzn.to/324iXaV
Amazon CA:
XS1500 https://amzn.to/31cdHml
XS2000 https://amzn.to/3halyGw
XS4000 https://amzn.to/32kJzVp
Official Website: https://www.viparspectra.com
How to use the light based on its specs:
Overall, the marketing and advertised specificactions for this light are spot on - without holding me accountable for every minute detail. However, the efficacy is more likely around ~2.5-2.6umol/J ballpark based on specs of bulk of diodes (samsung chips).
I'm going to work with ~400umol/s for this fixture. It's a ballpark figure. (375-400 ish). Also based on bulk of diode's manufacture specs... Ballpark figures.
PPFD in 2x2 or 4 sq. ft. equals about 1080 PPFD
You would want CO2 in this context. 850-950PPFD (~35-40DLI) over 12 hours or about 550-650 over 18hours is roughly your ceiling with ambient CO2. This value can vary by garden.
PPFD in 3x3 or 9 sq. ft. equals about 480 PPFD over 12 hours or 720PPFD over 18 hours
This is near bottom for a photoperiod in bloom phase given only 12 hours per day, but 720PPFD is still up in a good range for an autoflower in nearly twice the space as above. PPFD x hours of use x a fancy factor provides DLI. So, you can see these things are directly proportional to DLI. Google "DLI Chart" (daily light integral). you can reference time and PPFD for resulting DLI. It is a simple chart of values.
Best Practices:
Photoperiods-
****Stick to 4-5sq feet for a photoperiod receiving 12 hours of light per day and you will produce as good of buds as you can produce with ambient CO2 levels. A light meter can help determine optimal height. The PAR maps above are a great resource too. 12-16" is probably going to be the sweet spot for this smaller footprint. LUX meters give relative intensity. Compare intensity at edge to middle by percentage. Try to maximize even coverage for your space.
Autoflowers-
**** You can use this light in a 9 sq ft area, if growing autoflowers, or want kick ass vegetative growth. Math above is based on an 18/6 cycle. It is directly proportional to time as i stated. So, twenty hours of light per day would provide 1/9th more PPFD per day and therefore 1/9th greater DLI too. 720PPFD over 18 hours will produce awesome buds. Over 20 hours, you are right back near ceiling with ambient CO2 - Is 4 hours of darkness enough? Moving on. I'd wager 16-18" will be your height to cover this larger footprint. Again, a light meter and the par map picture provided can help greatly here.
Now, all of that is a ballpark to start out. Observe plant and react to its behaviour to fine tune how you use any light. Too much light -- plant may get weak or even fall over. It might get droopy up top, etc. Extreme issues would cause bleached spots that spread quickly in most intense areas of light. Too little light and you will see stretching and pale stems early on or merely too much stretching later. Internode length, too short or too long, will quickly tell you if you need to adjust intensity of light provided. Over the next couple weeks, you'll see me going through this learning curve, too.
When you get this light you'll want to torch your plants, but use this information to your advantage. It'll save you time finding that happy zone for coverage and distance from canopy. In the case of a quality light, more is not always better.
------------------------------------------------
FWIW, if you regulate CO2 and elevate it to 'max' levels needed, you can theoretically provide upto ~60-65 DLI over 12 hours. This is a ceiling of ~1500PPFD and ~1000PPFD over 18 hours for an autoflower. Do not try to reach these levels without lab precision in your environment and growing methods. Even then expect to fall moderately short of this theoretical ceiling. I cannot give suggestions here, as i don't regulate CO2.
Ambient CO2, figure roughly 35-40 DLI. Regardless, plant dictates these boundaries. This is merely a good starting point -- observe and adjust to reality.
Look forward to this diary should be very interesting. I’m wanting to run some auto asked fastbuds but they avoided the question and tried to get me to sign up for some thing to try make them sales
@@NobodysBuds,oh I know mate a bit of miss communication lol this is autos I was just saying I want to do some from fast buds didn’t mean these were fast buds my bad my terrible writing try to bare with me
Hola, últimamente he cambiado mi concepto de riegos con macetas de tela y otras similares, ahora las mantengo más húmedas y alterno muchos riegos suaves para disolver el exceso de nutrientes en el sustrato y mantener muy funcional todo el sistema radicular, apoyando la movilidad de las raíces con sustratos ligeros y porosos y con microorganismos. Mi objetivo es poblar completamente de raíces la maceta definitiva, en las más o menos 3 semanas de crecimiento vegetativo. También para mi la única espera larga para el siguiente riego es después del primer riego profundo desde el trasplante, aproximadamente una semana para maceta cuadrada old scholl, 4 días para las de tela y 5 días para las air-pot.
El mayor riesgo que le veo a la humedad es que esté parada en la maceta mucho tiempo, es que pierde el oxígeno, y creo que sólo por el mero hecho de disponer de macetas de tela o aireadas no es suficiente, la costumbre de dejar secar mucho el sustrato, antes del siguiente riego, aduciendo que así se oxigena, para mi tiene varias inconvenientes: la escasa humedad afecta a la vida de los microorganismos y las pequeñas raíces adventicias; la movilidad del oxígeno en capas profundas del sustrato se consigue con agua muy oxigenada... yo ahora estoy calculando la cantidad de riego inicial en maceta, multiplicando por 3 la media del consumo diario, dejando consumir dos partes y regando de nuevo, me va bien.
Disculpas si me extendido o aburrido... fumo mucho!! Saludos 👊
@Ned_Grows, estoy totalmente de acuerdo que el entorno influye en la materia prima, animal o vegetal, a la hora de crear fertilizantes orgánicos y en relación a los metales pesados que mencionas, en mi caso, busco fuentes donde no haya tocado el hombre, vivo en un entorno natural sin polución y procuro proveerme de materia prima virgen, empezando por el agua de riego. De todos modos, yo no tengo datos al respecto.
Los fertilizantes de síntesis química se basan en sales minerales y además sus costos de producción con relación también al medio ambiente son poco sostenibles. Mi concepto de cultivo se basa principalmente en la acción de los microorganismos del sustrato imitando al bosque, sin renunciar a la tecnología y dado que queremos la máxima producción para nuestros cultivos, elaboro mis propios fertilizantes solubles con materia prima que tengo cerca, algunos bastante complejos, de esta manera además, me independizo de la industria y me entretiene mucho.
Yo creo que las plantas necesitan de todos los minerales de la tabla periódica, aunque sea sólo una pequeña presencia de muchos de ellos, creo también, que en cuanto más variedad de minerales contiene un ser vivo más posibilidades de evolucionar tiene y más complejo es... al final las plantas son los minerales animados. La industria agro química ha simplificado mucho el tema de la fertilización y prácticamente distribuye nutrientes básicos nada más: NPK, Ca, Mg, Fe, Si... y poco más.
@deFharo, There appears to be a misconception that inorganic or synthetic fertilizers contain higher levels of heavy metals than organic fertilizers. In my experience, this is most often not the case. First off, it is important to state that pretty much all fertilizers will have some amount of heavy metals. Even if the amounts are below the minimum detection level of the analysis, there are likely still trace amounts present. What I’ve noticed is that granular organic fertilizer products will, more often than not, have higher levels of heavy metals and generally higher levels than their liquid organic counterparts. On the other end of the spectrum, the water-soluble and concentrated liquid inorganic or synthetic fertilizers almost always have the lowest amounts of heavy metals with many clocking it at the non-detectable level.
The reason for these differences is the source. The granular organic fertilizers that are derived from animal matter tend to have the highest levels. This is likely linked to the type of diet they consume. Plant-based organic fertilizers come in next in regard to heavy metals. The levels will vary depending on the plant because not all plants take in metals in the same amounts. I think almost anyone would be surprised at the arsenic levels of a standard sea kelp extract. Basically, anything that is alive and consuming food and nutrients from the surrounding environment will begin to accumulate heavy metals. This is all very natural.
On the other hand, inorganic or synthetic fertilizers usually come from specifically mined mineral sources where heavy metals are found in much smaller amounts. The levels found in these fertilizers are often a direct reflection of the purity of the mineral source. Food and pharmaceutical-grade inorganic minerals have a much higher purity level than cheaply-mined sources and such quality will come at a price but the difference will be extremely noticeable. In turn, they will be more soluble in water and have better uptake into plant roots. It is also important to keep in mind that some heavy metals, such as zinc and manganese, are essential plant nutrients as well.
Feel same with autos , but still will do two mass grows just to use all seeds away and for Heather not to be mad ;))
Till i started to preload epsom salt to soil and use calmag during flower even if they look , that they don't need it i bumped up into troubles, LEDs are very calmag burning out stuff.
@@NobodysBuds, i used peroxide bath, soda bath , natural lemon juice bath and pure water last, even bud rot that i missed , dryout perfectly without infecting other buds. I use it for two years in a row for my outdoor grow, heavy smokers were noticing smoothness of smoke the most, maybe its mold spors in air you can smell ? In my youth in soviet union we had sulphur smoke "granades" to disinfect greenhouses, that was wiping PM any bug or any fungus, toxic tho, google maybe there is morden days alternative.
My caravan was having mold issues in grow room till i started never cool him down, dry air helped to sort shit in area. Still took couple years and only third reinstallement and tent helped to sort it out.
@@NobodysBuds, you will see how smooth taste is after peroxide, you loose smell, but no harshness at all pays it off. Should be not bad , especially if its back up "in case" only ;)))
@@@NobodysBuds, Here in Russia I have such benefit as broken... electricity consumption meter, or how you call them... Energy supplier company does not care and I pay fixed around $12 monthly and don't care. I actually thought of replacing my TS 600 by TS 1000, which is also 150 W and 22000 lumen. And with dimming it could be even ok. And yes, It is suitable for more space, so I will leave it as is.