quality = genetics, not the light under common sense contexts.. unless you specifically reference density of the buds. less light will result in larfier buds, and at some point that will greatly impact quality, of course, but no one should be growing weed in that context because it is easily avoided.
100g - 150g us a reasonable expectation of non-larfy buds from "100w". Efficacy of the light will be the primary factor here along with how well you fill the space. anything that amounts to less than low 20's DLI will be larfy... anything in low 20 DLI won't be incredibly dense, either.
just as some people measure their dicks from their taint, you often hear absurd things in regard to yield. counting larf isn't the real weight, imho. it's fodder for extracts and such
umol/s per m^2 = ppfd //
ppfd "x" hours of use = DLI (simplified - not the a real math at end but proportional to hours of use, which is all we need to know)
so, referencing a dli table, you can see over 18 hours you only need about 600 PPFD. there are 10.76 ft^2 per m^2. 600 / 10.76 = 56 umol/s per sq ft and operating 18 hours a day is near maximum for ambient co2, give or take.
if you light gives off 250umol/s, it can cover 250 / 56 = just under 5 sq ft at near max DLI. You can give less and cover a larger area. density of buds will suffer at some point. this is a better way of understanding how much light you want to give relative to area of coverage.
that is all proportional to hours of use. so over 12 hours for a photoperiod in flower, that same light can only cover 66% the area at the same DLI. or about 84 umol/s per sq ft -- ends up being 900PPFD or 150% (3/2 or 18/12) of what is needed over 18 hours. 250 / 84 = will equal 66% or thereabouts of the above, i'm too lazy to open calculator again. rounding errors may cause slight shift. i truncated the above value at soem point to a whole integer.
you can do the same thing working backward from minium DLI too.. 22-25DLI is as low as you want to go, but i'm not recommending it. informational purposes only. if you are on metric system, even easier since you can skip the whole converting to per sq ft thing. just do ur space relative to 1m^2.