High efficiency lights can do it with 460-500w, like the FC4800 and others.
Less efficient may need 600watts, like a 600w zeus 'whatever' light. Their "pro 465w zeus" is comparable to the FC-4800 by mars too.
Efficacy is what you pay for. As long as you have 75-85 umol/s per sq ft of the tent, it'll provide upper end of light that a plant can handle per day given ambient co2. 800-900 umol/s per m^2 if comfortable with metric.
1.44 * 800 = 1152
1.44 * 900 = 1296
So, you want a light that produces 1150-1300 umol/s of PAR. The greater the efficacy, the fewer watts needed. Anything promising over 2.9umo/J is probably lying 9 or 10 times. The trick with the EVO diodes is listing the efficacy just for the 6500K chips, which is not representative (3.14umol/J), since no grow light is 6500k plus the non-white diodes will draw the average down slightly too. If they lie about the simple stuff, they'll lie to you about anything.
The umol/s power is what dictates yield - it doesn't matter how efficiently it is produced given context of typical grow lights. Efficacy will improve lognevity (actually get 50,000 hours of use), decrease heat produced by light, and save money on electric bill each month.
If in a warm region, it will really benefit you to buy the more efficient light. If you are in a cold area, a less efficient light might save more in heating electricity, lol. but, it'll still die faster if it runs hotter. Unless the cost difference is huge, it's usually better to spend a bit more upfront for greater efficacy. 2.8-2.9umol/J -- You only need 465w for 1300 umol/s at 2.8umol/J.