plants don't have their own feeding chart. They mostly all want the same thing.. though there can be some variety. People think they are finnicky, but that's more a product of a poor fertilization formula more often than genetics. Easier to blame outside sources than to be accountable for our own actions.
Nutrients are mostly ubiquitous. they have a pool of options to supply various nutrient molecules, but it is a limited pool. If the company has followed existing knowledge bases, for example, they'll all have a very similar ratio of what provides nitrogen, because while one option is faster acting, there is synergy of mixing in some ammonium-based N. this example may be more applicable to soilless/hydro nutrient setups.
If in soil, you allow the soil to do the work early on, slowly start to supplement it as it's nutrient charge is exhausted. It's going to be a bit different for every "soil" substrate out there. If you buy the same product, or mix up your own the same way each time, you'll learn how to amp up your fertilization in an effective way through trial and error.
If in soilless/hydro you simply provide a well-balanced diet from the get go every irrigation. With a solid medium you want 10% runoff waste, which maintains a consistent equilibrium of nutrient concentration of the substrate and avoids buildup. Minimal trial and error if you start from a good place with formula. If any 'hydro' ferts aren't easy to use out of the box, they probably suck ass.