these labels are irrelevant to growing. Useful when communicating context to others, but the actual effort to grow is not useful. So, no worries.
You'll find varying definitions of when a plant is no longer a seedling. I prefer to focus on cause and effect vs a label. If it's asking for full power on the lights (i.e. stretching) and it's handling full strenght fertilizer, it's no longer a seedling as far as i am treating it. What it wants dictates what i do.. not an ambiguous label that barely correlates to reality.
call a young plant a seedling and it communicates the idea to others, but not much use to you in your garden. And, not even a consistent definition among plant biologists, lol. even if there is a specific definition, it's still ambigious to some extent. like the scientific term "organic" -- it's a silly term even in chemistry. instead of admitting a mistake they just re-defined it at least 1 time, lol... originally the term was made up before we could synthesize organic molecules. there are exceptiosn to the genearlized rules (i.e. co2 is inorganice even though it contains carbon) .. it's a mostly useless term that reflects the corruption of species-centric / earth-centric bias. Chemistry is still 10x better than biology with this problem, lol.
first serated leaves? 8" tall? who gives a f? am i right? what does the plant want and need... it's pretty consistent regardless of the label. It's only a few days before they need increasingly intense light. while a seed can power itself early on, a light dose of nutes or whatever is in a soil can speed up the process slightly. in a soilless context, i'm feeding nearly full dose by the first irrigation after sprouting - only 1.0-1.3EC, which would be considered a light charge in soil, i assume.
When it needs full power / full nutes, it's 'mature' enough.