not on that plant. there's only a handful of leaves.
the sugars produced from photosynthesis are mobile. Yes, local production will more greatly impact local bud sites, but the top-most bud sites will always take the lion's share due to apical dominance.
less is more in this regard. some people do this as a compulsion / obssession with not much thought or too much faith in the "method" that they neglect to see the repercussions of it.
airflow is the better reason to do it. a bud sight 33% further away from your lights get significantly less intense light than the leaf removed above it (inverse sqare law at work with many points of light - each diode). so you took a leaf that was recieving more energy/light and now favoring a leaf that receives a lot less... not always a a good thing, but in some contexts, maybe so.
i would leave more... learn what sort of problems actually are likely to occur in your environment, then adjust from there. that way you only take off what is needed. leaves power growth. they are relevant. higher leaves produce more ATP per day than lower leaves. ATP powers growth. we have it iin our bodies, too, though it is produced a different way (krebb's cycle? one aerobic, one anaerobic process - when you feel that 'burn' in muscles it's the anaerobic process caused by lactic acid buildup).